A cultural exposition model for interpreting architectural heritage: A study on Pingyao historical city
Architectural heritage, encompassing both its material and immaterial aspects, serves as a vital lens for understanding the historical, social, and esthetic values embedded in a society. As a reflection of cultural evolution, it offers insight into the architectural technologies, social structures, and collective memories of specific historical periods. This article investigates the architectural history of Pingyao historical city by employing theoretical perspectives that integrate material, social, and spiritual dimensions. The study demonstrates how the philosophy and cultural values of ancient Chinese society are reflected in the spatial and architectural forms of Pingyao. The material dimension considers how principles such as Feng Shui, numerology, and color symbolism shaped the city’s general layout and building designs. The social attribute addresses the influence of Confucianism on spatial organization, the use of culturally significant architectural elements, and the function of key structures in fostering social unity among the population. The spiritual aspect explores concepts of Eastern origin, such as Yin and Yang, the Five Elements theory, and the “Unity of Heaven and Humanity,” as these are incorporated into the city’s external architecture. Furthermore, it examines the influence of Buddhism and Daoism on Pyingyao’s architectural features. This comprehensive analysis reveals that Pingyao is far more than a collection of historic buildings; it is an intricate cultural artifact, offering a unique perspective on earlier stages of Chinese thought and society. Therefore, the preservation and study of Pingyao’s architecture offer a valuable opportunity to deepen our understanding of China’s architectural history.
- Blake, J. (2000). On defining the cultural heritage. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 49(1):61-85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002058930006396X
- Borri, A., & Corradi, M. (2019). Architectural heritage: A discussion on conservation and safety. Heritage, 2(1): 631-647. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage2010041
- Chang, T. C. (2017). Cultural heritage. In: International Encyclopedia of Geography. United States: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0485
- China Discovery. (2024). Updated Pingyao Maps, Pingyao Ancient City Maps 2024/2025. Available from: https:// www.chinadiscovery.com/pingyao-tours/maps.html [Last accessed: 2004 Mar 17].
- (2014). In: D Reader and L Chinese (eds.). J Legge (Trans.). Book of Rites, Liji. Singapore: Dragon Reader.
- Guo, P. (2010). ZangJing. China: Jiangsu People’s Publishing Press.
- Hammitt, W. E. (1981). A theoretical foundation for Tilden’s interpretive principles. The Journal of Environmental Education, 12(3):13-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1981.10801905
- Han, B. D. (2006). Lectures on Chinese Architectural Culture: Life, Reading, and New Knowledge. Hong Kong: Sanlian Publishing Press.
- Huang, T. M. A. (2000). The Numerology of the I Ching: A Sourcebook of Symbols, Structures, and Traditional Wisdom. United States: Simon and Schuster.
- (2006). ICOMOS-Ename charter for the interpretation of cultural heritage sites. The George Wright Forum, 23(1):34-39.
- Knapp, R. G. (2012). Chinese Houses: The Architectural Heritage of a Nation. Vermont: Tuttle Publishing.
- Li, X., Hou, W., Liu, M., & Yu, Z. (2022). Traditional thoughts and modern development of the historical urban landscape in china: Lessons learned from the example of Pingyao Historical City. Land, 11(2):247. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020247
- Li, Y. H. (2006). Analysis of the Design Principles of Chinese Classical Architecture by Chinese Artists. China: Tianjin University Press.
- Liang, S. C. (1981). Architectural History and Theory. China: Jiangsu People’s Publishing Press.
- Liu, M. (2023). Analysis on the Interpretation of Architectural Culture in Pingyao Ancient City [PhD thesis]. Thailand: Srinakharinwirot University.
- Lou, Q. X. (2003). Twenty Lectures on Chinese Ancient Architecture. Hong Kong: Sanlian Publishing Press.
- Mak, M. Y., & Ng, S. T. (2005). The art and science of Feng Shui--A study on architects’ perception. Building and Environment, 40(3):427-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.07.016
- Matthews, M. R. (2019). Feng Shui Practice. In: MR Matthews (ed.). Feng Shui: Teaching About Science and Pseudoscience. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, pp. 65-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18822-1_4
- Memmott, P., & Keys, C. (2015). Redefining architecture to accommodate cultural difference: Designing for cultural sustainability. Architectural Science Review, 58(4):278-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2015.1032210
- Nowacki, M. (2021). Heritage interpretation and sustainable development: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 13(8):4383. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084383
- Pearce, S. M. (2000). The making of cultural heritage. In: E Avrami, R Mason and M de la Torre (eds.). Values and Heritage Conservation: Research Report. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute, pp. 59-64. Available from: https:// www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/pdf_ publications/values_herit/age_research_report.html [Last accessed: 2024 Jan 17].
- Qin, H. L. (2006). The Ethical Connotation of Architecture. China: China Architecture & Building Press.
- Staiff, R. (2014). Re-imagining Heritage Interpretation: Enchanting the Past-Future. 1st ed. United Kingdom: Routledge.
- Su, X. (2018). Reconstructing tradition: Heritage authentication and tourism-related commodification of the ancient city of Pingyao. Sustainability, 10(3):670. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030670
- Tilden, F. (2008). Interpreting Our Heritag. 4th ed. United States: The University of North Carolina Press.
- Uzzell, D. L. (1996). Creating place identity through heritage interpretation. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 1(4):219-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527259608722151
- Wang, R. R. (2005). Dong Zhongshu’s transformation of “Yin- Yang” theory and contesting of gender identity. Philosophy East and West, 55(2):209-231. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2005.0013
- Wang, S. Y. (2011). In search of authenticity in historic cities in transformation: The case of Pingyao, China. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 9(1):18-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766825.2010.521562
- Xiaoguang, K. (2012). A study of the renaissance of traditional Confucian culture in contemporary China. In: Confucianism and Spiritual Traditions in Modern China and Beyond. Netherlands: Brill, pp. 31-73.
- Xiong, W. (2003). Pingyao: The Living Ancient City [Master’s Thesis]. United States: Texas Tech University.
- Xu, P. (1998). “Feng-Shui” models structured traditional Beijing courtyard houses. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 15(4):271-282.
- Xu, W. L. L. (2013). Mencius. China: Zhonghua Book Company.
- Zhang, D. (2022). Pingyao historic city and Qiao family courtyard. Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 4(1):47. https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.v4i1.47