AccScience Publishing / JCAU / Volume 4 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.36922/jcau.v4i2.174
Cite this article
121
Download
153
Citations
1165
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Multi-Level Housing Governance in Rural Settlement: Transformation of Two Vernacular Houses in Zhejiang Province of China

Xiaoyu Lin1* Beisi Jia2
Show Less
1 Department of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, Guangdong province, 518055, China
2 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism 2022, 4(2), 174 https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.v4i2.174
Submitted: 18 August 2022 | Accepted: 6 January 2023 | Published: 16 January 2023
© 2023 by the Author(s). Licensee AccScience Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Vernacular houses are a dynamic complex that assemble multi-dimension variables of time, space, and people. Two governance systems, which are the officials and the people, control the village on different levels, and the spheres of their influences are distinct during different socio-economy periods. In this paper, a multi-level analytical framework is used to regroup information. Three agents are engaged in modeling the issue that each plays a different role in different levels of construction. This paper takes the two cases, the Old Tang House (OTH) and the Sishuishanzhuang Chen House (SSCH) in the Xiaqiao Village (under bridge village) in Zhejiang Province of China to study the transformation process of housing settlement in three building levels. The methods of morphology and typology are used to illustrate and disintegrate the process of housing transformation. Then, a further reading of space is conducted to explain how the hidden agents influence and control the transformation. As a result, a clear hierarchy of governance approaches is proved that the larger the scale of observed space, the higher the order of governance power. What happens in settlement level are always controlled by formal governance, meanwhile, in architectural level are controlled by more informal agents from individuals.

Keywords
levels
governance
agent
rural built environment
vernacular architecture
Funding
National Natural Science Fund of China
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Shenzhen Imported Overseas High-Level Talents Research Fund
References
[1]

The Open Group. The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF), online open resources, 1999–2006, https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf8-doc/arch/chap26.html

[2]

Collins P. Changing ideals in modern architecture, 1750-1950. 1967, McGill Univ. Press, Montreal, 2–13.

[3]

Rudofsky B. Architecture without architects: a short introduction to non-pedigreed architecture. 1964, UNM Press, Albuquerque. 

[4]

Rudofsky B. The prodigious buildings. 1977, Harcort Brace Jovanovic, New York Garden City.

[5]

Gardi R. Indigenous African architecture. 1973, Van Nostrad Reinhold, New York.

[6]

Oliver P. Shelter, sign and symbol. 1975, Barrie and Jenkins, London. 

[7]

Duly C. The houses for mankind.1979, Thames and Hudson Ltd, London.

[8]

Blier S. The anatomy of architecture: ontology and metaphor in Batammaliba architectural expression. 1987, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[9]

Oliver P. Shelter and society. 1976, Barrie and Jenkins, London.

[10]

Oliver P (ed). Encyclopedia of vernacular architecture of the world. 1997, Volume 1, 2 and 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[11]

Oliver P. Dwellings: the house across the world. 1987, University of Texas Press, Austin.

[12]

Rapoport A. House form and culture. 1969, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

[13]

Glassie H. Folk housing in middle Virginia: a structural analysis of historic artifacts. 1976, University of Tennessee Press, Tennessee.

[14]

Upton D, Vlach J. Common places: readings in American vernacular architecture. 1986, University of Georgia Press, Georgia.

[15]

Turan M. Vernacular architecture: paradigms of environmental response. 1993, Avebury, Aldershot.

[16]

Bourdier J, Al Sayyad N. Dwellings, settlements, and tradition: cross-cultural perspectives.1989, University Press of America, Maryland.

[17]

Asquith L, Vellinga M (eds). Vernacular architecture in the twenty-first century: theory, education and practice. 2006, Taylor & Francis, Oxfordshire.

[18]

Duan J. Chengzhen kongjian jiexi: Taihu Liuyu guzhen kongjian jiegou yu xingtai [Urban spatial analysis: spatial structure and form of ancient towns in the Taihu Lake Basin]. 2002, China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing.

[19]

Kong Y, Zhang J, Yan R. Chuantong juluo kongjian xingtai gouyin de duofa huzheng—Dui Jinan Wangfuchizi pianqu de tushi fenxi [Multi-method mutual proof of the spatial form structure of traditional settlements—Illustrated analysis of Wangfuchizi area in Jinan] [J]. Architectural Journal, 2016(5): 86–91. 

[20]

Wang Y. Chuantong juluo jiegou zhong de kongjian gainian [Spatial concept in traditional settlement structure]. 2016, China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing. 

[21]

Wang Y. Zaidixingyingzao: Sunan xiangcun juluo kongjian xingtai leixing jiqi yanhua yanjiu. 2019, Southeast University Press, Nanjing.

[22]

Habraken NJ. An alternative to mass housing [Translated by B. Valkenburg]. 1972, Architectural Press, London.

[23]

Conzen MRG. Alnwick, Northumberland: a study in town plan analysis. 1960 (2nd revised edition, 1969), Institute of British Geographers, London.

[24]

Kendall S, Teicher J, Residential open building. 2000, Spon Press, London.

[25]

Jia B, Jiang Y. Flexibility of traditional buildings and craftsmanship in China [J]. Open House International, 2011, 36(4): 20–31.

[26]

Lin X, Jia B. Living sustainability: transformation of the built environment in Xiaqiao Village, China [J]. Procedia - Engineering, 2016, 142(02): 48–55.

[27]

Lin X, Jia B. The intangible sustainability on tangible flexibility: a case study of vernacular architecture in Shangjiaoyang Village, Taishun, China (1814-1949) [J]. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 179: 141–153.

[28]

Friedman E, Pickowicz PG, Selden M, et al. Chinese village, socialist state. 1993, Yale University Press, 225.

[29]

Gregory R. Cadres and kin: making a socialist village in West China, 1921–1991. 1998, Stanford Press, Stanford, 96.

[30]

Qin H. Chuantong zhonghua diguo de xiangcun jichu kongzhi [Foundational control over villages in traditional Chinese empires]. 2005, The Commercial Press, Shanghai, 2.

[31]

Shue V. The reach of the state: sketches of the Chinese body politic. 1998, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, Electronic ISSN: 2717-5626 Print ISSN: TBA, Published by AccScience Publishing