AccScience Publishing / ITPS / Volume 6 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.36922/itps.197
Cite this article
147
Download
1327
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
REVIEW

Adhesive Cementation of Ceramic Restorations: A Comprehensive Review

Isha Sinha1*
Show Less
1 District Nutrition Consultant, State Resource Centre, Nalanda Medical College, Patna, Bihar, India
INNOSC Theranostics and Pharmacological Sciences 2023, 6(1), 28–34; https://doi.org/10.36922/itps.197
Submitted: 16 September 2022 | Accepted: 29 March 2023 | Published: 11 April 2023
© 2023 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

The success and tendency of the indirect restorations were mainly affected by the patient and dental surgeon factors. The patient factors consist of their dietary, functional habits, and oral hygiene, while the surgeon factors consist of their management in tooth preparation, impression, and cementation. Among these factors, cementation is a very crucial step to ensure retention, durability, and marginal seal of indirect restoration. The field of dentistry has largely benefited from the various newer types of ceramic introduced. However, this cementation process can be either adhesive or non-adhesive. Adhesive cementation refers to the use of an agent that promotes the bonding of restorative material to substrate, whereas the non-adhesive cementation involves the use of luting agent for filling the gap between restoration and natural tooth. However, the indication for use of adhesive or non-adhesive cementation depends on various factors, such as resistance form, ceramic composition, available preparation retention, and field control during the cementation process. Hence, it is important for the clinicians and dental surgeons to understand these factors before selecting an appropriate cementation process for ceramic restorations. In this review, we provide an overview of adhesive cementation process for ceramic restorations and make appropriate recommendations for routine dental practice.

Keywords
Adhesive dentistry
Ceramic restorations
Cementation
Dental cements
Funding
None.
References
[1]

Shi, H.Y.; Pang, R.; Yang, J.; Fan, D.; Cai, H.; Jiang, H.B.; Han, J.; Lee, E.S.; Sun, Y. Overview of Several Typical Ceramic Materials for Restorative Dentistry. Biomed Res. Int., 2022, 2022, 8451445.

[2]

Pereira, R.M.; Ribas, R.G.; Montanheiro, T.L.D.; Schatkoski, V.M.; Rodrigues, K.F.; Kito, L.T.; Kobo, L.K.; Campos, T.M.B.; Bonfante, E.A.; Gierthmuehlen, P.C.; Spitznagel, F.A.; Thim, G.P. An Engineering Perspective of Ceramics Applied in Dental Reconstructions. J. Appl. Oral Sci., 2023, 31, e20220421.

[3]

Ellakany, P.; Madi, M.; Aly, N.M.; Alshehri, T.; Alameer, S.T.; Al-Harbi, F.A. Influences of Different CAD/CAM Ceramic Compositions and Thicknesses on the Mechanical Properties of Ceramic Restorations: An in vitro Study. Materials (Basel), 2023, 16(2), 646.

[4]

Pospiech, P. All-Ceramic Crowns: Bonding or Cementing? Clin. Oral Investig., 2002, 6(4), 189–97.

[5]

Thompson, J.Y.; Stoner, B.R.; Piascik, J.R.; Smith, R. Adhesion/ Cementation to Zirconia and other Non-Silicate Ceramics: Where are we now? Dent. Mater., 2011, 27(1), 71–82.

[6]

The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: Ninth Edition. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2017, 117(5S), e1–105.

[7]

Manso, A.P.; Carvalho, R.M. Dental Cements for Luting and Bonding Restorations: Self-Adhesive Resin Cements. Dent. Clin. North Am., 2017, 61(4), 821–34.

[8]

Kiomarsi, N.; Jarrah, A.; Chiniforoush, N.; Hashemikamangar, S.S.; Kharazifard, M.J. Effect of Surface Treatment with Laser on Repair Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Ceramic. Dent. Res. J. (Isfahan), 2022, 19, 30. 

[9]

Tomar, S.S.; Bhattacharyya, J.; Ghosh, S.; Goel, P.; Das, S.; Chakarvarty, K. Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of All-Metal Crowns with Different Luting Agents after Undergoing Various Modes of Surface Treatments: An in-vitro Study. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc., 2015, 15(4), 318–25.

[10]

Duarte, S.J.; Lolato, A.L.; de Freitas, C.R.; Dinelli, W. SEM Analysis of Internal Adaptation of Adhesive Restorations after Contamination with Saliva. J. Adhes. Dent., 2005, 7(1), 51–6.

[11]

Recen, D.; Yildirim, B.; Othman, E.; Comlekoglu, E.; Aras, I. Bond Strength of Metal Brackets to Feldspathic Ceramic Treated with Different Surface Conditioning Methods: An in vitro Study. Eur. Oral. Res., 2021, 55(1), 1–7.

[12]

Sabuncuoglu, F.A.; Erturk, E. Shear Bond Strength of Brackets Bonded to Porcelain Surface: In vitro Study. J. Istanb. Univ. Fac. Dent., 2016, 50(1), 9–18. 

[13]

Sobouti, F.; Aryana, M.; Dadgar, S.; Navaei R.A.; Rakhshan, V. Effects of Novel Versus Conventional Porcelain Surface Treatments on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res. Int., 2022, 2022, 8246980. 

[14]

Janda, R.; Roulet, J.F.; Wulf, M.; Tiller, H.J. A New Adhesive Technology for Allceramics. Dent. Mater., 2003, 19(6), 567–73.

[15]

Platt, J.A. Resin Cements: Into the 21st Century. Compend. Contin. Educ Dent., 1999; 20(12):1173–6, 1178, 1180–2; quiz 1184.

[16]

Pegoraro, T.A.; da Silva, N.R.; Carvalho, R.M. Cements for Use in Esthetic Dentistry. Dent. Clin. North Am., 2007, 51(2), 453–71, x. 

[17]

Silva, L.H.D.; Lima, E.; de Paula Miranda, R.B.; Favero, S.S.; Lohbauer, U.; Cesar, P.F. Dental Ceramics: A Review of New Materials and Processing Methods. Braz. Oral Res., 2017, 31(suppl 1), e58.

[18]

Peng, E.; Zhang, D.; Ding, J. Ceramic Robocasting: Recent Achievements, Potential, and Future Developments. Adv. Mater., 2018, 30(47), e1802404.

[19]

Della Bona, A.; Borba, M.; Benetti, P.; Pecho, O.E.; Alessandretti, R.; Mosele, J.C.; Mores, R.T. Adhesion to Dental Ceramics. Curr. Oral Health Rep., 2014, 1(4), 232–8.

[20]

Spear, F.; Holloway, J. Which all-Ceramic System is Optimal for Anterior Esthetics? J. Am. Dent. Assoc, 2008, 139(suppl), 19S–24S.

[21]

Bottino, M.A.; Salazar-Marocho, S.M.; Leite, F.P.P.; Vásquez, V.C.; Valandro, L.F. Flexural Strength of Glass-Infiltrated Zirconia/ Alumina-Based Ceramics and Feldspathic Veneering Porcelains. J. Prosthodont., 2009, 18(5), 417–20.

[22]

Blatz, M.B.; Vonderheide, M.; Conejo, J. The Effect of Resin Bonding on Long-Term Success of High-Strength Ceramics. J. Dent. Res., 2018, 97(2), 132–9.

[23]

Alsaeed, A.Y. Bonding CAD/CAM Materials with Current Adhesive Systems: An Overview. Saudi Dent. J., 2022, 34(4), 259–69.

[24]

Meng, X.F.; Yoshida, K.; Gu, N. Chemical Adhesion rather than Mechanical Retention Enhances Resin Bond Durability of a Dental Glass-Ceramic with Leucite Crystallites. Biomed Mater., 2010, 5(4), 044101.

[25]

Kitayama, S.; Nikaido, T.; Takahashi, R.; Zhu, L.; Ikeda, M.; Foxton, R.M.; Sadr, A.; Tagami, J. Effect of Primer Treatment on Bonding of Resin Cements to Zirconia Ceramic. Dent. Mater., 2010, 26(5), 426–32.

[26]

Arif, R.; Dennison, J.B.; Garcia, D.; Yaman, P. Retrospective Evaluation of the Clinical Performance and Longevity of Porcelain Laminate Veneers 7 to 14 Years after Cementation. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2019, 122(1), 31–7.

[27]

Friedman, M.J. A 15-year Review of Porcelain Veneer Failure--a Clinician’s Observations. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent., 1998, 19(6), 625–8, 630, 632 passim; quiz 638.

[28]

Barghi, N. To Silanate or not to Silanate: Making a Clinical Decision. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent., 2000, 21(8), 659–62, 664; quiz 666. 

[29]

Matinlinna, J.P.; Vallittu, P.K. Bonding of Resin Composites to Etchable Ceramic Surfaces-An Insight Review of the Chemical Aspects on Surface Conditioning. J. Oral Rehabil., 2007, 34(8), 622–30.

[30]

Cekic, I.; Ergun, G.; Lassila, L.V.J.; Vallittu, P.K. Ceramic-Dentin Bonding: Effect of Adhesive Systems and Light-Curing Units. J. Adhes. Dent., 2007, 9(1), 17–23.

[31]

Kanehira, M.; Finger, W.J.; Hoffmann, M.; Komatsu, M. Compatibility Between an all-in-one Self-Etching Adhesive and a Dual-Cured Resin Luting Cement. J. Adhes. Dent., 2006, 8(4), 229–32.

[32]

Santi, M.R.; Lins, R.B.E.; Sahadi, B.O.; Denucci, G.C.; Soffner, G.; Martins, L.R.M. Influence of Inorganic Composition and Filler Particle Morphology on the Mechanical Properties of Self- Adhesive Resin Cements. Restor. Dent. Endod., 2022, 47(3), e32.

[33]

Lürhs, A.K.; Guhr, S.; Günay, H.; Geurtsen, W. Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Resins Compared to Resin Cements with Etch and Rinse Adhesives to Enamel and Dentin in vitro. Clin. Oral Investig., 2010, 14(2), 193–9.

[34]

Weiser, F.; Behr, M. Self-Adhesive Resin Cements: A Clinical Review. J. Prosthodont., 2015, 24(2), 100–8.

[35]

Fasbinder, D.J.; Dennison, J.B.; Heys, D.; Neiva, G. A Clinical Evaluation of Chairside Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns: A Two-Year Report. J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 2010, 141(suppl 2), 10S–4S.

[36]

Wolfart, S.; Eschbach, S.; Scherrer, S.; Kern, M. Clinical Outcome of Three-unit Lithium-Disilicate Glass-Ceramic Fixed Dental Prostheses: Up to 8 Years Results. Dent. Mater., 2009, 25(9), e63–71. 

[37]

Cuzic, C.; Pricop, M.O.; Jivanescu, A.; Ursoniu, S.; Negru, R.M.; Romînu, M. Assessment of Different Techniques for Adhesive Cementation of all-Ceramic Systems. Medicina (Kaunas), 2022, 58(8), 1006.

[38]

Kern, M.; Thompson, V.P. Bonding to Glass Infiltrated Alumina Ceramic: Adhesive Methods and their Durability. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1995, 73(3), 240–9.

[39]

Tavakolizadeh, S.; Dehghan, M.; Ghoveizi, R.; MScD, D.; Fayyazi, A. Shear Bond Strength of Zirconia Ceramic to Four Different Core Materials, An in vitro Study. J. Dent. (Shiraz), 2021, 22(2), 138–43.

[40]

Guess, P.C.; Zhang, Y.; Kim, J.W.; Rekow, E.D.; Thompson, V.P. Damage and Reliability of Y-TZP after Cementation Surface Treatment. J. Dent. Res., 2010, 89(6), 592–6.

[41]

Lin, J.; Shinya, A.; Gomi, H.; Shinya, A. Effect of Self-adhesive Resin Cement and Tribochemical Treatment on Bond Strength to Zirconia. Int. J. Oral. Sci., 2010, 2(1), 28–34.

[42]

Kern, M.; Barloi, A.; Yang, B. Surface Conditioning Influences Zirconia Ceramic Bonding. J. Dent. Res., 2009, 88(9), 817–22. 

[43]

Magne, P.; Paranhos, M.P.G.; Burnett, L.H. Jr. New Zirconia Primer Improves Bond Strength of Resin-Based Cements. Dent. Mater., 2010, 26(4), 345–52.

[44]

Takeuchi, K.; Fujishima, U.; Manabe, A.; Kuriyama, S.; Hotta, Y.; Tamaki, Y.; Miyazaki, T. Combination Treatment of Tribochemical Treatment and Phosphoric Acid Ester Monomer of Zirconia Ceramics Enhances the Bonding Durability of Resin-Based Luting Cements. Dent. Mater. J., 2010, 29(3), 316–23.

[45]

De Souza, G.M.; Silva, N.R.; Paulillo, L.A.; De Goes, M.F.; Rekow, E.D.; Thompson, V.P. Bond Strength to High-Crystalline Content Zirconia after Different Surface Treatments. J. Biomed Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 2010, 93(2), 318–23.

[46]

Wegner, S.M.; Kern, M. Long-Term Resin Bond Strength to Zirconia Ceramic. J. Adhes. Dent., 2000, 2(2), 139–47.

[47]

Øilo, M.; Haugli, K.; Rønold, H.J.; Ulsund, A.H.; Ruud, A.; Kvam, K. Pre-Cementation Procedures’ Effect on Dental Zirconias with Different Yttria Content. Dent. Mater., 2021, 37(9), 1425–36.

Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
Share
Back to top
INNOSC Theranostics and Pharmacological Sciences, Electronic ISSN: 2705-0823 Published by AccScience Publishing