AccScience Publishing / EJMO / Volume 7 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.14744/ejmo.2023.41377
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Role of SATB2 5' Untranslated Region Promoter Methylation in Formation of Non-syndromic Cleft Palate Only

Yingwen Ji1 Yandan Xie2,* Ming Zhang1 Jieyan Zhou1 Lihong Peng1 Yingling Zheng1 Shenyou Shu1
Show Less
1 The Cleft Lip and Palate Treatment Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong China
2 Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
3 *These authors contributed equally to this work and share first authorship., *These authors contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.
EJMO 2023, 7(2), 165–173; https://doi.org/10.14744/ejmo.2023.41377
Submitted: 28 December 2022 | Revised: 18 March 2023 | Accepted: 3 May 2023 | Published: 19 June 2023
© 2023 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Objectives: Accumulating evidence has implicated DNA methylation in the development of non-syndromic cleft palate only (NSCPO); however, little is known about the underlying epigenetic mechanism. This study was to elucidate the role of SATB2 5'untranslated region (UTR) promoter methylation in formation of NSCPO.

Methods: DNA methylation profiling was performed on discarded human palatal tissue after repair of NSCPO (case) or maxillofacial and palate trauma (control), using an Illumina 850K-EPIC BeadChip methylation array. The SATB2 5'UTR promoter methylation level was confirmed by pyrosequencing.

Results: Five CpG sites (cg14273610, cg22334352, cg25103650, cg22845542 and cg06199336) in the SATB2 5'UTR promoter was hypermethylated in cases compared with controls (P<0.05). Pyrosequencing revealed a mean methylation rate of 31.81% vs. 16.45% (p=0.0019) at the cg14273610 CpG site, 22.12% vs. 9.28% (p=0.0102) at the cg22334352 CpG site, 24.41% vs. 8.74% (p=0.0003) at the cg25103650 CpG site, 51.66% vs. 23.97%(p=0.0165) at the cg22845542 CpG site and 31.05% vs. 16.43% (p=0.0091) at the cg06199336 CpG site for cases and controls, respectively. The pyrosequencing results were consistent with those from the Illumina 850K-EPIC methylation BeadChip array.

Conclusion: Our results suggested that the SATB2 may be responsible for NSCPO formation and could be a potential biomarker for NSCPO.

Keywords
5'UTR
methylation
non-syndromic cleft palate only
SATB2
Conflict of interest
None declared.
References

1. Mossey PA, Modell B. Epidemiology of Oral Clefts 2012: An International Perspective Front Oral Biol 2012;16:1–18.
2. Burg M L, Chai Y, Yao C A, Magee W 3rd, Figueiredo J C. Epidemiology, Etiology, and Treatment of Isolated Cleft Palate. Front Physiol 2016;7:67.
3. Watkins SE, Meyer RE, Strauss RP, Aylsworth AS. Classification,  epidemiology, and genetics of orofacial clefts. Clin Plast Surg 2014;41:149–63.
4. Martinelli M, Palmieri A, Carinci F, Scapoli L. Non-syndromic  cleft palate: an overview on human genetic and environmental risk factors. Front Cell Dev Biol 2020;8:592271.
5. Suzuki A, Sangani D R, Ansari A, Iwata J. Molecular mechanisms of midfacial developmental defects. Dev Dyn 2016;245:276–93.
6. Hu J, Lu J, Lian G, Ferland R J, Dettenhofer M, Sheen V L. For-min 1 and filamin B physically interact to coordinate chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation in the growth plate. Hum Mol Genet 2014;23:4663–73.
7. Letra A, Menezes R, Granjeiro J M, Vieira A R. Axin2 and Cdh1 polymorphisms, tooth agenesis, and oral clefts. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2009;85:169–73.
8. Chiquet B T, Lidral A C, Stal S, Mulliken J B, Moreno L M, ArcosBurgos M, et al. Crispld2: A novel nsclp candidate gene. Hum Mol Genet 2007;16:2241–8. 
9. Casey L M, Lan Y, Cho E S, Maltby K M, Gridley T, Jiang R. Jag2- notch1 signaling regulates oral epithelial differentiation and palate development. Dev Dyn 2006;235:1830–44.
10. Venza M, Visalli M, Venza I, Torino C, Tripodo B, Melita R, et al. Altered binding of Myf-5 to Foxe1 promoter in non-syndromic and charge-associated cleft palate. J Oral Pathol Med. 2009;38:18–23.
11. Gu M, Zhang Y, Liu H, Liu J, Zhu D, Yang X. Msh homeobox 1 polymorphisms and the risk of non-syndromic orofacial clefts: a meta-analysis. Eur J Oral Sci 2018;126:180–5.
12. Fu X, Cheng Y, Yuan J, Huang C, Cheng H, Zhou R. Loss-offunction mutation in the X-linked Tbx22 promoter disrupts an Ets-1 binding site and leads to cleft palate. Hum Genet.2015;134:147–58. 
13. Nikopensius T, Jagomagi T, Krjutskov K, Tammekivi V, Saag M, Prane I, et al. Genetic variants in Col2a1, Col11a2, and Irf6 contribute risk to nonsyndromic cleft palate. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2010;88:748–56.
14. McCarthy N, Liu JS, Richarte AM, Eskiocak B, Lovely CB, Tallquist MD, et al. Pdgfra and Pdgfrb genetically interact during craniofacial development. Dev Dyn 2016;245:641–52.
15. van Rooij IA, Wegerif MJ, Roelofs HM, Peters WH, KuijpersJagtman AM, Zielhuis GA, et al. Smoking, genetic polymorphisms in biotransformation enzymes, and nonsyndromic oral clefting: a gene-environment interaction. Epidemiology 2001;12:502–7.
16. Wu T, Schwender H, Ruczinski I, Murray JC, Marazita ML, Munger RG, et al. Evidence of gene-environment interaction for two genes on chromosome 4 and environmental tobacco smoke in controlling the risk of nonsyndromic cleft palate. PLoS One 2014;9:e88088.
17. Trivedi PB, Padovano WM, Skolnick GB, Menezes MD, Grames LM, Cheung S, et al. Evaluation of discipline-specific outcomes through a multidisciplinary team clinic for patients with isolated cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2021;58:1517–25.
18. Shkoukani MA, Lawrence LA, Liebertz DJ, Svider PF. Cleft palate: a clinical review. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2014;102:333–42.
19. Bureau A, Parker MM, Ruczinski I, Taub MA, Marazita ML, Murray JC, et al. Whole exome sequencing of distant relatives in multiplex families implicates rare variants in candidate genes for oral clefts. Genetics 2014;197:1039–44.
20. Pengelly RJ, Arias L, Martinez J, Upstill-Goddard R, Seaby EG, Gibson J, et al. Deleterious coding variants in multi-case families with non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate phenotypes. Sci Rep 2016;6:30457.
21. Greenberg MVC, Bourc'his D. The diverse roles of DNA methylation in mammalian development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2019;20:590–607.
22. Leenen FA, Muller CP, Turner JD. DNA methylation: conducting the orchestra from exposure to phenotype? Clin Epigenetics 2016;8:92.
23. Garland MA, SunB, Zhang S, Reynolds K, Ji Y, Zhou CJ. Role of epigenetics and mirnas in orofacial clefts. Birth Defects Res 2020;112:1635–59.
24. Iacobazzi V, Infantino V, Castegna A, Andria G. Hyperhomocysteinemia: Related genetic diseases and congenital defects, abnormal DNA methylation and newborn screening issues. Mol Genet Metab 2014;113:27–33.
25. Smith ZD, Meissner A. DNA methylation: roles in mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet 2013;14:204–20.
26. Alvizi L, Ke X, Brito LA, Seselgyte R, Moore GE, Stanier P, et al. Differential methylation is associated with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate and contributes to penetrance effects. Sci Rep 2017;7:2441.
27. Bengani H, Handley M, Alvi M, Ibitoye R, Lees M, Lynch S A, et al. Clinical and molecular consequences of disease-associated de novo mutations in satb2. Genet Med 2017;19:900–8. 
28. FitzPatrick DR, Carr IM, McLaren L, Leek JP, Wightman P, Williamson K, et al. Identification of Satb2 as the cleft palate gene on 2q32-Q33. Hum Mol Genet 2003;12:2491–501.
29. Aryee MJ, Jaffe AE, Corrada-Bravo H, Ladd-Acosta C, Feinberg AP, Hansen KD, et al. Minfi: A flexible and comprehensive bioconductor package for the analysis of infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics 2014;30:1363–9.
30. Morris TJ, Butcher LM, Feber A, Teschendorff AE, Chakravarthy AR, Wojdacz TK, et al. Champ: 450k chip analysis methylation pipeline. Bioinformatics 2014;30:428–30.
31. Jolliffe IT, Cadima J. Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 2016;374:20150202.
32. Afyouni S, Smith S M, Nichols T E. Effective degrees of freedom of the Pearson's correlation coefficient under autocorrelation.
Neuroimage 2019;199:609–25.
33. Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2004;3:Article3.
34. Ruiz S, Diep D, Gore A, Panopoulos AD, Montserrat N, Plongthongkum N, et al. Identification of a specific reprogramming-associated epigenetic signature in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:16196–201.
35. Luo C, Hajkova P, Ecker JR. Dynamic DNA Methylation: in the right place at the right time. Science 2018;361:1336–40.
36. Suzuki MM, Bird A. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat Rev Genet 2008;9:465–46. 
37. Ferguson MW. Palate development. Development 1988;103:41–60.
38. Logan SM, Benson MD. Medial epithelial seam cell migration during palatal fusion. J Cell Physiol 2020;235:1417–24.
39. Lan Y, Xu J, Jiang R. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of palatogenesis. Curr Top Dev Biol 2015;115:59–84.
40. Leoyklang P, Suphapeetiporn K, Siriwan P, Desudchit T, Chaowanapanja P, Gahl WA, et al. Heterozygous nonsense mutation Satb2 associated with cleft palate, osteoporosis, and cognitive defects. Hum Mutat 2007;28:732–8.
41. Gyorgy A B, Szemes M, de Juan Romero C, Tarabykin V, Agoston DV. Satb2 interacts with chromatin-remodeling molecules in differentiating cortical neurons. Eur J Neurosci.2008;27:865–73.
42. Yu F, Liang M, Huang Y, Wu W, Zheng B, Chen C. Hypoxic tumor-derived exosomal mir-31-5p promotes lung adenocarcinoma metastasis by negatively regulating satb2-reversed emt and activating mek/erk signaling. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2021;40:179.
43. Dobreva G, Dambacher J, Grosschedl R. Sumo Modification of a novel mar-binding protein, satb2, modulates immunoglobulin mu gene expression. Genes Dev 2003;17:3048–61.

Share
Back to top
Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology, Electronic ISSN: 2587-196X Print ISSN: 2587-2400, Published by AccScience Publishing