AccScience Publishing / EJMO / Volume 3 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.14744/ejmo.2019.25477
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Importance of Biomarkers in Determining Post-Implantation Syndrome Developing Due to Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Selen Ozturk1 Ugur Kisa1 Kemal Kavasoglu1 Mehmet Emre Elci1 Mehmet Aydin Kahraman1 Yigit Kose1 Sebil Merve Sen1 Ibrahim Ozturk2 Cevdet Ugur Kocogullari1
Show Less
1 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Dr. Siyami Ersek Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
2 Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Medeniyet University Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
EJMO 2019, 3(3), 211–218; https://doi.org/10.14744/ejmo.2019.25477
Received: 22 September 2018 | Accepted: 25 December 2018 | Published online: 29 July 2019
© 2019 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to undertake a systematic review of the literature in order to investigate whether preoperative biomarkers have diagnostic significance in determining post-implantation syndrome PIS possibility after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: Literature review was carried out in PubMed electronic database without any limitations of date. Included were studies that recorded the preoperative levels of inflammatory biomarkers in which PIS develops following EVAR and that were published only in English. Results of the studies were evaluated based on either random or fixed effect model in accordance with the presence of heterogeneity (I2>25%). Statistical analysis were performed by Open meta Analyst® software. Results: A total of 349 articles were found upon a database screening. After the article titles and abstracts were analysed, 6 articles were included in the meta-analysis that cover 891 patients and comply with inclusion criteria. It was observed in the studies that WBC, CRP, thrombocyte, IL-6, and fibrinogen levels were analysed. It was found from the conducted analysis that the preoperative levels of WBC (SMD: 0.70 95% CI: 0.55-0.86 and p<0.001), fibrinogen (SMD: 0.27 95% CI: 0.03-0.51 and p=0.02), IL-6 (SMD: 1.04 95% CI: 0.64-1.44 and p<0.001), and thrombocyte (SMD: 0.91 95% CI: 0.13-0.69 and p=0.02) were significant in determining the PIS development, however, CRP levels were not (SMD: 0.37 95% CI: -0.20-0.96 and p=0.20). Conclusion: We concluded that WBC, thrombocyte, fibrinogen, and IL-6 levels were effective in predicting PIS developing after EVAR in preoperative period.

Keywords
Biomarker
endovascular aneurysm repair
meta-analysis
post-implantation syndrome
Conflict of interest
None declared.
References

Kouvelos GN, Arnaoutoglou E, Giannoukas AD, Matsagkas M. Postimplantation Syndrome: An Underrecognized EVAR Complication. J Endovasc Ther 2017;24:675–6. [CrossRef]

2. Arnaoutoglou E, Kouvelos G, Koutsoumpelis A, Patelis N, Lazaris A, Matsagkas M. An Update on the Inflammatory Response after Endovascular Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Mediators Inflamm 2015. [CrossRef]

3. Sartipy F, Lindström D, Gillgren P, Ternhag A. The role of procalcitonin in postimplantation syndrome after EVAR: a pilot study. Ann Vasc Surg 2014;28:866–73. [CrossRef]

4. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015;1;4:1. [CrossRef]

5. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005;5:13. [CrossRef]

6. Arnaoutoglou E, Kouvelos G, Milionis H, Mavridis A, Kolaitis N, Papa N, et al. Post-implantation syndrome following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: preliminary data. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011;12:609–14. [CrossRef]

7. Arnaoutoglou E, Kouvelos G, Papa N, Gartzonika K, Milionis H, Koulouras V, et al. Prospective evaluation of postimplantation syndrome evolution on patient outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2016;63:1248–55. [CrossRef]

8. Gorla R, Erbel R, Kahlert P, Tsagakis K, Jakob H, Mahabadi AA, et al. Clinical features and prognostic value of stent-graftinduced post-implantation syndrome after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with type B acute aortic syndromes. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;49:1239–47. [CrossRef]

9. Kwon H, Ko GY, Kim MJ, Han Y, Noh M, Kwon TW, et al. Effects of postimplantation systemic inflammatory response on long-term clinical outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e4532. [CrossRef]

10. Nano G, Occhiuto MT, Stegher S, Malacrida G, Cova M, Righini P, et al. Postimplantation syndrome after endovascular aortic repair using the Anaconda™ endograft. Ann Vasc Surg 2014;28:1409–15. [CrossRef]

11. Arnaoutoglou E, Kouvelos G, Papa N, Kallinteri A, Milionis H, Koulouras V, et al. Prospective evaluation of post-implantation inflammatory response after EVAR for AAA: influence on patients' 30 day outcome. Eur J VascEndovasc Surg 2015;49:175– 83. [CrossRef]

12. Velázquez OC, Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Barker CF, Golden M, Criado F, et al. Perigraft air, fever, and leukocytosis after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Am J Surg 1999;178:185–9. [CrossRef]

13. Yazman S, Yürekli İ, Yılık L, et al. Our mid-term results of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2016;24:274–280. [CrossRef]

14. Spanos K, Karathanos C, Giannoukas AD. Redefining the pathophysiology of post-implantation syndrome after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Vascular 2017;25:110. [CrossRef]

15. Blum U, Voshage G, Lammer J, Beyersdorf F, Töllner D, Kretschmer G, et al. Endoluminal stent-grafts for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 1997:2;336:13–20.

16. Voûte MT, Bastos Gonçalves FM, van de Luijtgaarden KM, Klein Nulent CG, Hoeks SE, Stolker RJ, et al. Stent graft composition plays a material role in thepostimplantation syndrome. J Vasc Surg 2012;56:1503–9. [CrossRef]

17. Odegård A, Lundbom J, Myhre HO, Hatlinghus S, Bergh K, Waage A, et al. The inflammatory response following treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison between open surgery and endovascular repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000;19:536–44. [CrossRef]

18. Ikoma A, Nakai M, Sato M, Sato H, Takeuchi H, Tanaka F, et al. Changes in inflammatory, coagulopathic, and fibrinolytic responses after endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm: relationship between fibrinogen degradation product levels and endoleaks. Jpn J Radiol 2014;32:347–55. [CrossRef]

19. Arnaoutoglou E, Kouvelos G, Tzimas P, Laou E, Bouris V, Papadopoulos G, et al. Relationship between normal preoperative white blood cell count and major adverse events after endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: results of a pilot study. J Clin Anesth 2017;36:201–205. [CrossRef]

20. Franco AT, Corken A, Ware J. Platelets at the interface of thrombosis, inflammation, and cancer. Blood 2015;30;126:582–8.

21. Kakisis JD, Moulakakis KG, Antonopoulos CN, et al. Volume of new-onset thrombus is associated with the development of postimplantation syndrome after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2014;60:1140–5. [CrossRef]

22. Žura M, Kozmar A, Šakić K, Malenica B, Hrgovic Z. Effect of spinal and general anesthesia on serum concentration of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Immunobiology 2012;217:622–7. [CrossRef]

23. Radak D, Djukic N, Tanaskovic S, Obradovic M, Cenic-Milosevic D, Isenovic ER. Should We be Concerned About the Inflammatory Response to Endovascular Procedures? Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2017;15:230–237. [CrossRef]

Share
Back to top
Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology, Electronic ISSN: 2587-196X Print ISSN: 2587-2400, Published by AccScience Publishing