Are MRI Findings of Gallbladder Bile Associated with Gallbladder Stone Formation?
Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possible association between the hyperintense saturated appearance of the gallbladder bile on T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the fasting state and the development of gallbladder stone on follow-up.
Methods: We evaluated 100 consecutive MRIs in the fasting state that have follow-up MRI but not gallbladder stone. On T1-weighted images, hyperintense and hypointense groups were formed according to gallbladder contents. Follow-up MRIs were evaluated in terms of gallbladder stone development. The groups with and without gallbladder stones were compared according to follow-up time.
Results: Gallbladder contents on MRI in the fasting state were T1 hyperintense in 85 patients and T1 hypointense in 15 patients. There was no statistically significant difference about the development of gallbladder stone on follow-up between the T1 hyperintense group (n: 11, 12.9%) and the T1 hypointense group (n: 2, 13.3%) (p=0.96). There was no statistically significant difference about the follow-up time between the groups with and without the development of gallbladder stone (p=0.20).
Conclusion: There was no significant relationship between the concentrated appearance of the gallbladder bile on T1-weighted MRI in the fasting state and the development of gallbladder stone on follow-up. We believe that this probable relationship can be evaluated more clearly with prospective studies, larger populations, and long-term follow-up.
1. Hricak H, Filly RA, Margulis AR, Moon KL, Crooks LE, Kaufman L. Work in progress: nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the gallbladder. Radiology 1983;147:481–4. [CrossRef]
2. Lee NK, Kim S, Lee JW, Lee SH, Kang DH, Kim DU, et al. MR appearance of normal and abnormal bile: correlation with imaging and endoscopic finding. Eur J Radiol 2010;76:211–21.
3. Catalano OA, Sahani DV, Kalva SP, Cushing MS, Hahn PF, Brown JJ, et al. MR imaging of the gallbladder: a pictorial essay. Radiographics 2008;28:135–55. [CrossRef]
4. Demas BE, Hricak H, Moseley M, Wall SD, Moon K, Goldberg HI, et al. Gallbladder bile: an experimental study in dogs using MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology 1985;157:453–5. [CrossRef]
5. Bader TR, Semelka RC. Gallbladder and biliary system. In: Semelka RC, editor. Abdominal-pelvic MRI. New York: Wiley–Liss; 2002. p. 447–507.
6. Pitt HA, Doty JE, DenBesten L, Kuchenbecker SL. Stasis before gallstone formation: altered gallbladder compliance or cystic duct resistance? Am J Surg 1982;143:144–9. [CrossRef]
7. Jüngst C, Kullak-Ublick GA, Jüngst D. Gallstone disease: Microlithiasis and sludge. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006;20:1053–62. [CrossRef]
8. Schneider G, Grazioli L, Saini S. Imaging of the biliary tree and gallbladder diseases. In: Schneider G, Grazioli L, Saini S, editors. MRI of the liver. 2nd. Heidelberg: Springer; 2005. p. 237–66.
9. Sahani DV, Kalva SP. Magnetic resonance imaging of the gallbladder. In: Edelman RR, Hesselink JR, Zlatkin MB, Crues VC, edıtors. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging. 3rd. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2005. p. 2541–53.
10. Baron RL, Shuman WP, Lee SP, Rohrmann CA Jr, Golden RN, Richards TL, et al. MR appearance of gallstones in vitro at 1.5 T: correlation with chemical composition. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:497–502. [CrossRef]
11. Moeser PM, Julian S, Karstaedt N, Sterchi M. Unusual presentation of cholelithiasis on T1-weighted MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988;12:150–2. [CrossRef]
12. Tsai HM, Lin XZ, Chen CY, Lin PW, Lin JC. MRI of gallstones with different compositions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:1513–9.
13. Ukaji M, Ebara M, Tsuchiya Y, Kato H, Fukuda H, Sugiura N, et al. Diagnosis of gallstone composition in magnetic resonance imaging: in vitro analysis. Eur J Radiol 2002;41:49–56. [CrossRef]
14. Kim YK, Kim CS, Lee JM, Ko SW, Chung GH, Lee SO, et al. Value of adding T1-weighted image to MR cholangiopancreatography for detecting intrahepatic biliary stones. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:W267–74. [CrossRef]
15. Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, Joseph L, Reinhold C, Barkun AN. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:547–57. [CrossRef]
16. Baillie J, Paulson EK, Vitellas KM. Biliary imaging: a review. Gastroenterology 2003;124:1686–99. [CrossRef]