AccScience Publishing / EJMO / Volume 1 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.14744/ejmo.2017.07379
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Proven Safety of Alternative Sedation Regimens for Esophagogastroduedonoscopy: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Sinan Uzman1 Bunyamin Gurbulak2 Sevim Baltalı3 Hasibe Aslan Sunul1 Ibrahim Ulusoy4 Idris Kurtulus4
Show Less
1 Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
2 Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
3 Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
4 General Secretary of Public Hospitals Association of Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
EJMO 2017, 1(3), 129–135; https://doi.org/10.14744/ejmo.2017.07379
Submitted: 5 July 2017 | Accepted: 7 September 2017 | Published: 26 September 2017
© 2017 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Objectives: In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare cardiopulmonary side effects, sedation characteristics, and patient satisfaction of propofol–meperidine and propofol–ketamine sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).

Methods: Data were extracted from the anesthesia and endoscopy records of the patients. Patients aged >18 years who underwent elective diagnostic EGD under sedation between January 2015 and December 2016 were enrolled in the study. Depending on the sedation procedure, the patients were divided into two groups: propofol–meperidine group (Group PM) and propofol–ketamine group (Group PK). Cardiopulmonary side effects (hypotension, bradycardia, apnea and hypoxemia), procedure times, and patient satisfaction were compared between the groups.

Results: In total, 154 consecutive patients who underwent elective diagnostic EGD between January 2015 and December 2016 under sedation with propofol–meperidine and propofol–ketamine were included in the study. The overall incidence of side effects did not differ between the groups, but the incidence of hypotension was significantly higher in Group PM compared with Group PK (7.8% vs. 0%, p=0.028). There was no significant difference in hypoxemia (p=0.597) and apnea (p>0.999) between the two groups. Awake time (time interval between the removal of the endoscope and responds readily to name spoken in normal tone) was significantly shorter in Group PM compared with Group PK (7.21±3.70 vs. 8.91±4.10 min, p=0.008). Patient satisfaction for the two groups were similar (p=0.245).

Conclusion: The propofol–ketamine sedation regimen seems to be superior compared with the propofol–meperidine sedation regimen in terms of hemodynamic stability. Both sedation regimens have similar respiratory safety profile. P ropofol–meperidine s edation p rovided f aster r ecovery t imes t han p ropofol–ketamine s edation f or E GD. Furthermore, high patient satisfaction levels were obtained with both sedation regimens.

Keywords
Cardiopulmonaryside effects
gastrointestinal endoscopy
ketamine
meperidine
propofo
Conflict of interest
None declared.
References

1.Sun W, Han X, Wu S, Yang C. Endoscopic Resection Versus Surgical Resection for Early Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1649.

2. Pasechnikov V, Chukov S, Fedorov E, Kikuste I, Leja M. Gastric cancer: prevention, screening and early diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:13842–62. [CrossRef]

3. Obara K, Haruma K, Irisawa A, Kaise M, Gotoda T, Sugiyama M, et al. Guidelines for sedation in gastroenterological endoscopy. Dig Endosc 2015;27:435–49. [CrossRef]

4. Uzman S, Gurbulak B, Gurbulak EK, Donmez T, Hut A, Yildirim D. A comparison of propofol and midazolam/meperidine sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2016;11:178–85. [CrossRef]

5. Cohen LB, Ladas SD, Vargo JJ, Paspatis GA, Bjorkman DJ, Van der Linden P, et al. Sedation in digestive endoscopy: the Athens international position statements. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;32:425–42. [CrossRef]

6. Moon SH. Sedation regimens for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Clin Endosc 2014;47:135–40. [CrossRef]

7. Goudra B, Nuzat A, Singh PM, Borle A, Carlin A, Gouda G. Association between Type of Sedation and the Adverse Events Associated with Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: An Analysis of 5 Years' Data from a Tertiary Center in the USA. Clin Endosc 2017;50:161–9. [CrossRef]

8. Yan JW, McLeod SL, Iansavitchene A. Ketamine-Propofol Versus Propofol Alone for Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 2015;22:1003–13. [CrossRef]

9. Akarsu Ayazoğlu T, Polat E, Bolat C, Yasar NF, Duman U, Akbulut S, et al. Comparison of propofol-based sedation regimens administered during colonoscopy. Rev Med Chil 2013;141:477– 85.

10. Igea F, Casellas JA, González-Huix F, Gómez-Oliva C, Baudet JS, Cacho G, et al; Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy. Sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 2014;46:720– 31. [CrossRef]

11. Tandon M, Pandey VK, Dubey GK, Pandey CK, Wadhwa N. Addition of sub-anaesthetic dose of ketamine reduces gag reflex during propofol based sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective randomised double-blind study. Indian J Anaesth 2014;58:436–41. [CrossRef]

12. Tosun Z, Aksu R, Guler G, Esmaoglu A, Akin A, Aslan D, et al. Propofol-ketamine vs propofol-fentanyl for sedation during pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Paediatr Anaesth 2007;17:983–8. [CrossRef]

13. Aljebreen AM, Alswat K, Almadi MA. Appropriateness and diagnostic yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open-access endoscopy system. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2013;19:219–22. [CrossRef]

14. Benson AA, Cohen LB, Waye JD, Akhavan A, Aisenberg J. Endoscopic sedation in developing and developed countries. Gut Liver 2008;2:105–12. [CrossRef]

15. Dumonceau JM, Riphaus A, Beilenhoff U, Vilmann P, Hornslet P, Aparicio JR, et al. European curriculum for sedation training in gastrointestinal endoscopy: position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA). Endoscopy 2013;45:496–504.

16. Ferreira AO, Cravo M. Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Where are we at in 2014? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015;7:102–9. [CrossRef]

17. Triantafillidis JK, Merikas E, Nikolakis D, Papalois AE. Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current issues. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:463–81. [CrossRef]

18. Goudra B, Nuzat A, Singh PM, Gouda GB, Carlin A, Manjunath AK. Cardiac arrests in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: A retrospective analysis of 73,029 procedures. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2015;21:400–11. [CrossRef]

19. Bandschapp O, Filitz J, Ihmsen H, Berset A, Urwyler A, Koppert W, et al. Analgesic and antihyperalgesic properties of propofol in a human pain model. Anesthesiology 2010;113:421–8.

20. Uliana GN, Tambara EM, Baretta GA. Use of remifentanil to reduce propofol injection pain and the required propofol dose in upper digestive tract endoscopy diagnostic tests. Braz J Anesthesiol 2015;65:437–44. [CrossRef]

21. Sieg A; bng-Study-Group, Beck S, Scholl SG, Heil FJ, Gotthardt DN, et al. Safety analysis of endoscopist-directed propofol sedation: a prospective, national multicenter study of 24441 patients in German outpatient practices. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;29:517–23. [CrossRef]

22. Hsieh YH, Chou AL, Lai YY, Chen BS, Sia SL, Chen IC, et al. Propofol alone versus propofol in combination with meperidine for sedation during colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009;43:753–7. [CrossRef]

23. Akin A, Esmaoglu A, Guler G, Demircioglu R, Narin N, Boyaci A. Propofol and propofol-ketamine in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Pediatr Cardiol 2005;26:553–7.

24. Green SM, Li J. Ketamine in adults: what emergency physicians need to know about patient selection and emergence reactions. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:278–81. [CrossRef]

25. Nejati A, Moharari RS, Ashraf H, Labaf A, Golshani K. Ketamine/propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial. Acad Emerg Med 2011;18:800–6. [CrossRef]

26. Krauss B, Green SM. Systemic analgesia and sedation for procedures. In: Chanmugam AS, Chudnofsky CR, Deblieux PMC, Mattu A, Swadron SP, editors. Roberts and Hedges' Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc; 2014. p. 2266–357.

27. Green SM, Roback MG, Kennedy RM, Krauss B. Clinical practice guideline for emergency department ketamine dissociative sedation: 2011 update. Ann Emerg Med 2011;57:449–61.

28. Salen P, Grossman M, Grossman M, Milazzo A, Stoltzfus J. A comparison of ketamine versus etomidate for procedural sedation for the reduction of large joint dislocations. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2016;6:79–84. [CrossRef]

29. Baykal Tutal Z, Gulec H, Derelı N, Babayıgıt M, Kurtay A, Inceoz H, et al. Propofol-ketamine combination: a choice with less complications and better hemodynamic stability compared to propofol? On a prospective study in a group of colonoscopy patients. Ir J Med Sci 2016;185:699–704. [CrossRef]

30. Sáenz-López S, Rodríguez Muñoz S, Rodríguez-Alcalde D, Franco A, Marín JC, de la Cruz J, et al. Endoscopist controlled administration of propofol: an effective and safe method of sedation in endoscopic procedures. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2006;98:25–35. [CrossRef]

31. Tagle M, Siu H, Ramos M. Propofol in combination with meperidine and midazolam in colonoscopy and upper endoscopy: first prospective study in private practice in Peru. Rev Gastroenterol Peru 2007;27:367–73.

32. Moon SH. Sedation regimens for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Clin Endosc 2014;47:135–40.

33. Angsuwatcharakon P, Rerknimitr R, Ridtitid W, Kongkam P, Poonyathawon S, Ponauthai Y, et al. Cocktail sedation containing propofol versus conventional sedation for ERCP: a prospective, randomized controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol 2012;12:20. [CrossRef]

34. Cohen LB, Hightower CD, Wood DA, Miller KM, Aisenberg J. Moderate level sedation during endoscopy: a prospective study using low-dose propofol, meperidine/fentanyl, and midazolam. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:795–803. [CrossRef]

35. Sipe BW, Scheidler M, Baluyut A, Wright B. A prospective safety study of a low-dose propofol sedation protocol for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;5:563–6. [CrossRef]

36. Türk HŞ, Aydoğmuş M, Ünsal O, Işıl CT, Citgez B, Oba S, et al. Ketamine versus alfentanil combined with propofol for sedation in colonoscopy procedures: a randomized prospective study. Turk J Gastroenterol 2014;25:644–9. [CrossRef]

37. Khajavi M, Emami A, Etezadi F, Safari S, Sharifi A, Shariat Moharari R. Conscious Sedation and Analgesia in Colonoscopy: Ketamine/Propofol Combination has Superior Patient Satisfaction Versus Fentanyl/Propofol. Anesth Pain Med 2013;3:208–13. [CrossRef]

38. ASGE Ensuring Safety in the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit Task Force, Calderwood AH, Chapman FJ, Cohen J, Cohen LB, Collins J, Day LW, et al. Guidelines for safety in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;79:363–72.

39. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 2002;96:1004–17. [CrossRef]

Share
Back to top
Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology, Electronic ISSN: 2587-196X Print ISSN: 2587-2400, Published by AccScience Publishing