AccScience Publishing / EJMO / Volume 1 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.14744/ejmo.2017.36855
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Effect of Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy on Quality of Life and Satisfaction of Patients with Discogenic Low Back Pain

Seher Ilhan1 Ibrahim Ozturk2
Show Less
1 Department of Algology, Mehmet Akif Inan Training and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey
2 Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Medeniyet University Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
EJMO 2017, 1(2), 101–105; https://doi.org/10.14744/ejmo.2017.36855
Submitted: 8 June 2017 | Accepted: 20 August 2017 | Published: 26 August 2017
© 2017 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Objectives: Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) is an intervention option for discogenic low back pain treatment. The aim of this study was to research the pain level, quality of life, and satisfaction of patients who underwent IDET.

Methods: This study was performed retrospectively with 50 patients treated with IDET for low back pain between April 1, 2014 and November 20, 2014. Age, weight, sex, body mass index, pain spread, location of intervention, 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) score, visual analogue score (VAS), and satisfaction level of the patients were recorded from data in the files. The satisfaction level of the patients was 70% (40% “benefitted” and 30% “fully recovered”).

Results: Of the 50 patients included in the analysis, the male/female ratio was 31/19, the mean age was 43.2±2 years, and the mean weight was 72.2±9 kg. There was a statistically significant difference in SF-36 physical function result, pain score, and VAS between mean pretreatment results and 3 months after treatment (p<0.05).

Conclusion: There was a significant difference in VAS, the SF-36 subscale of physical function, and pain points before treatment and after treatment with IDET, and the post-treatment satisfaction level of the patients was high.

Keywords
Intradiscal electrothermal therapy
low back pain
quality of life
satisfaction level
Conflict of interest
None declared.
References

1.Saal JA, Saal JS. Intradiscal electrothermal treatment for chronic discogenic low back pain: A prospective outcome study with minimum 1-year follow-up. Spine 2000;25:2622- 2627. [CrossRef]

2. Saal J. Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy. Mayer HM (ed). Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Springer. Munich. 2006. pg260- 266. [CrossRef]

3. Spruit M, Jacobs WC. Pain and function after intradiscal electrothermal treatment (IDET) for symptomatic lumbar disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 2002;11:589-593. [CrossRef]

4. Saal JS, Saal JA: Management of chronic discogenic low back pain with a thermal intradiscal catheter. Spine 25:382-388, 2000. [CrossRef]

5. Freedman BA, Cohen SP, Kuklo TR, Lehman RA, Larkin P, Giuliani JR. Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) for chronic low back pain in activeduty soldiers: 2-year follow-up. Spine J 2003;3:502-509. [CrossRef]

6. Endres SM, Fiedler GA, Larson KL. Effectiveness of intradiscal electrothermal therapy in increasing function and reducing chronic low back pain in selected patients. WMJ 2002;101:31- 34.

7. Cohen SP, Larkin T, Abdi S, Chang A, Stojanovic M. Risk factors for failure and complications of intradiscal electrothermal therapy: A pilot study. Spine 2003; 28:1142-1147. [CrossRef]

8. Pauza K, Howell S, Dreyfuss P, Peloza JH, Dawson K, Bogduk N. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of intradiscal electrothermal therapy for treatment of discogenic low back pain. Spine J 2004;4:27–35. [CrossRef]

9. Freeman BJ, Fraser RD, Cain CM, Hall DJ, Chapple DC. A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain.Spine;30:2369–77, 2005. [CrossRef]

10. Karasek M, Bogduk N. Twelve-month follow-up of a controlled trial of intradiscal thermal anuloplasty for back pain due to internal disc disruption. Spine 2000;25:2601-2607. [CrossRef]

11. Bogduk N, Karasek M. Two-year followup of a controlled trial of intradiscal electrothermal anuloplasty for chronic low back pain resulting from internal disc disruption. Spine J 2002;2:343-350. [CrossRef]

12. Singh V. Intradiscal electrothermal therapy: a preliminary report. Pain Physician 2000;3:367-373.

13. Kapural L, Mekhail N, Korunda Z, Basali A. Intradiscal thermal annuloplasty for the treatment of lumbar discogenic pain in patients with multilevel degenerative disc disease. Anesth Analg 2004;99:472-476.

14. Mekhail N, Kapural L. Intradiscal thermal annuloplasty for discogenic pain: an outcome study. Pain Practice 2004;4:84-90.

15. Saal JA, Saal JS. Intradiscal electrothermal treatment for chronic discogenic low back pain: prospective outcome study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine 2002;27:966-973.

16. Gerszten PC, Welch WC, McGrath PM. A prospective outcomes study of patients undergoing intradiscal electrothermy (IDET) for chronic low back pain. Pain Physician 2002;5:360-364.

Share
Back to top
Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology, Electronic ISSN: 2587-196X Print ISSN: 2587-2400, Published by AccScience Publishing