Bayesian network-based approach for dam safety diagnosis

Certain frontline dam safety management personnel lack the ability to diagnose dam hazard issues and often find it difficult to identify potential risks in practice. Existing causal analysis methods for dam safety diagnosis struggle to provide specific reasoning paths and quantify risk probabilities. To address this gap, this study proposes a dam safety diagnostic method based on Bayesian networks (BNs). First, historical cases of dam safety hazards were collected and classified to extract various types of hazard issues, abnormal manifestations, and underlying causes, which were used as nodes within the BN. Correlation analysis was then performed to identify relationships among the nodes, enabling the construction of directed edges that form the BN structure. The degree centrality algorithm was employed to analyze the prior probabilities of parent nodes, while Bayes’ theorem was applied to calculate the conditional probabilities of the child nodes, generating conditional probability tables for all nodes within the network. Using the BN’s posterior probability inference method, the probabilities of hidden hazards in a target dam were calculated, facilitating accurate diagnosis and root cause tracing of potential risks. Finally, a case study involving a hidden hazard in a domestic earth-rock dam was used to validate the proposed method. The results demonstrate that the method efficiently utilizes a large number of scattered dam hazard cases, is less affected by subjective factors, provides clear reasoning links and risk probabilities, and can accurately identify dam hazard issues and trace their root causes, offering technical support for dam operation and safety management personnel.
- Jiang ZX, He JP. Method of fusion diagnosis for dam service status based on joint distribution function of multiple points. Math Probl Eng. 2016;S2016:9049260. doi: 10.1155/2016/9049260
- Su HZ, Wen ZP, Sun XR, Yan X. Multisource information fusion-based approach diagnosing structural behavior of dam engineering. Struct Control Health Monit. 2018;25(2):e2073. doi: 10.1002/stc.2073
- Xu Y, Zhang LM, Jia JS. Diagnosis of embankment dam distresses using Bayesian networks. Part II. Diagnosis of a specific distressed dam. Canad Geotech J. 2011;48(11):1645-1657. doi: 10.1139/T11-070.
- Dong K, Mi ZK, Yang DW. Comprehensive diagnosis method of the health of tailings dams based on dynamic weight and quantitative index. Sustainability. 2022;14(5):3068. doi: 10.3390/su14053068
- Jiang ZX, Wu B, Chen H. Dam health diagnosis model based on cumulative distribution function. Water Resour Manag. 2023;37(11):4293-4308. doi: 10.1007/s11269-023-03553-6
- Zhang LM, Xu Y, Jia JS, Zhao C. Diagnosis of embankment dam distresses using Bayesian networks. Part I. Global-level characteristics based on a dam distress database. Canad Geotechn J. 2011;48(11):1630-1644. doi: 10.1139/T11-069
- Garg A, Kaur A, Dangi H. Outsourcing of fire inspection services: An analytical approach. Asian J Water Environ Pollut. 2024;21(6):189-194. doi: 10.3233/ajw240086
- Wen LF, Yang Y, Li YL, et al. Comprehensive evaluation method for the concrete-face rockfill dams behavior based on the fuzzy recognition model. J Perform Constructed Facil. 2022;36(3):04022021. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001734
- Sonsare PM, Khedgaonkar R, Singh K, et al. Environmental applications of molecular graph learning: Graph neural network based prediction of partition coefficients. Asian J Water Environ Pollut. 2025;22(3):88-103. doi: 10.36922/ajwep025070041
- Wang F, Zhong DH, Yan YL, Ren B, Wu BP. Rockfill dam compaction quality evaluation based on cloud-fuzzy model. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A. 2018;19(4):289-303. doi: 10.1631/jzus.a1600753
- Abu-Afifeh Q, Rahbeh M, Al-Afeshat A, et al. Dam sustainability’s interdependency with climate change and dam failure drivers. Sustainability. 2023;15(23):16239. doi: 10.3390/su152316239
- Lv ZJ, Li JJ, He GJ. Hazard assessment of concrete dam cracks based on variable fuzzy sets and the modified analytic hierarchy process. Arab J Sci Eng. 2023;48(10):13165-13178. doi: 10.1007/s13369-023-07668-1
- Alrazgan M, Ghoneim A, Albesher L, et al. Automated hybrid methodology for software architecture style selection using analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. IET Softw. 2025;2025(1):9943825.doi: 10.1049/sfw2/9943825
- Hassan DS, Zaki AH, Hawash MK. Estimation of hazard rate function for building second order mixed model using fuzzy techniques. Asian J Water Environ Pollut. 2022;19(2):109-116. doi: 10.3233/ajw220030
- Hu YJ, Wu LZ, Pan XQ, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of cloud manufacturing service based on fuzzy theory. Int J Fuzzy Syst. 2021;23(6):1755-1764. doi: 10.1007/s40815-021-01071-4
- Bonet E, Yubero MT, Sanmiquel L, et al. Neural network approaches for leakage flow quantification in masonry dam. Innov Infrastruct Solut. 2024;9(11):426. doi: 10.1007/s41062-024-01744-7
- Bakary K, Mouhamadou D, Seydou T. Contribution based on neurons networks for the prediction of greenhouse gas emissions in a handling port. Asian J Water Environ Pollut. 2024;21(6):261-269. doi: 10.3233/ajw240094
- Wang GY, Xu CL, Li DY. Generic normal cloud model. Inf Sci. 2014;280:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.04.051
- Mandal S, Khan DA. Cloud-CoCoSo: Cloud model-based combined compromised solution model for trusted cloud service provider selection. Arab J Sci Eng. 2022;47(8):10307-10332. doi: 10.1007/s13369-021-06512-8
- Cai RC, Wu YJ, Huang XK, Chen W, Fu TZ, Hao Z. Granger causal representation learning for groups of time series. Sci China Inf Sci. 2024;67(5):56-68. doi: 10.1007/s11432-021-3724-0
- Zhao JC, Huang LA, Wu XQ, Xiao L. The impact of trade war on Shanghai stock exchange industry based on Granger causality network. Acta Phys Sin. 2021;70(7):325-333. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201516
- Man J, Dong HH, Jia LM, Qin Y. GGC: Gray-Granger causality method for sensor correlation network structure mining on high-speed train. Tsinghua Sci Technol. 2022;27(1):207-222. doi: 10.26599/tst.2021.9010034
- Heckerman D, Geiger D, Chickering DM. Learning bayesian networks: The combination of knowledge and statistical data. Mach Learn. 1995;20:197-243. doi: 10.1023/a:1022623210503
- Briganti G, Scutari M, McNally RJ. A tutorial on Bayesian networks for psychopathology researchers. Psychol Methods. 2022;28(4):947-961. doi: 10.1037/met0000479
- Zhong L, Xue FZ. A lung cancer risk prediction model based on Bayesian network uncertainty inference. J Shandong Univ Health Sci. 2023;61(4):89-94.
- Wu XG, Zhao HY, Xu WT, Pan W, Ji Q, Hua X. Fault diagnosis of the distribution network based on the D-S evidence theory Bayesian network. Front Energy Res. 2024;12:1422639. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1422639
- Wu YF, Wei YM, Yang B, et al. An improved fault diagnosis method for solid-liquid rocket engine. Chin Space Sci Technol. 2023;43(1):88-99. doi: 10.16708/j.cnki.1000-758x.2023.0009
- Li ZK, Wang T, Ge W, Wei D, Li H. Risk analysis of earth-rock dam breach based on dynamic Bayesian network. Water. 2019;11(11):2305. doi: 10.3390/w11112305
- Li ZK, Wang T, Ge W, et al. Risk analysis of concrete dam breach based on dynamic Bayesian network. J Changjiang River Sci Res Inst. 2021;38(5):137-143.
- Chen Y, Lin PZ. Bayesian network of risk assessment for a super-large dam exposed to multiple natural risk sources. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 2019;33(2):581-592. doi: 10.1007/s00477-018-1631-0
- Yue ZY, Wei Z, Wang KQ, et al. Reliability evaluation of integrated energy system based on Bayesian network time series simulation. Acta Energiae Solaris Sin. 2024;45(10):220-230. doi: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2023-0958
- Cai SL. Research on Routing Algorithms of Vehicular Delay Tolerant Networks Based on Bayesian Network. China: Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications; 2023.
- Gemela J. Learning Bayesian networks using various datasources and applications to financial analysis. Soft Comput. 2003;7(5):297-303. doi: 10.1007/s00500-002-0216-4
- Drton M, Maathuis MH. Structure learning in graphical modeling. Ann Rev Stat Appl. 2017;4:365-393.
- Vomlel J, Kratochvíl V, Kratochvíl F. Structural learning of mixed noisy-OR Bayesian networks. Int J Approx Reason. 2023;161:108990. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2023.108990
- Gao WL, Zeng ZM, Ma ML, Ke Y, Zhi M. An improved hybrid structure learning strategy for Bayesian networks based on ensemble learning. Intell Data Anal. 2023;27(4):1103-1120. doi: 10.3233/ida-226818
- Laskey KB, Sun W, Hanson R, Twardy C, Matsumoto S, Goldfedder B. Graphical model market maker for combinatorial prediction markets. J Artif Intell Res. 2018;63:421-460. doi: 10.1613/jair.1.11249
- Kessler S, Cobb A, Rudner TGJ, Zohren S, Roberts SJ. On sequential Bayesian inference for continual learning. Entropy. 2023;25(6):884. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2301.01828
- Dutta R, Mira A, Onnela JP. Bayesian inference of spreading processes on networks. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018;474(2215):20180129. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2018.0129