Approaches to Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution: A Literature Review
It is not feasible and perhaps impossible to formulate an universal technique for predicting groundwater vulnerability, one that considers all of the ways in which contamination occurs or that is appropriate for all situations. The intended use of the vulnerability assessment process is the most obvious and important factor to consider in selecting a vulnerability assessment approach. The three classes (Overlay and Index Methods, Process based Simulation Model Methods and Statistical Methods) of methods for assessing groundwater vulnerability range in complexity from a subjective evaluation of available map data to the application of complex transport models are available. Each class has its own characteristic strengths and weaknesses that affect its suitability for particular application. This paper attempts to review all the major approaches developed worldwide for groundwater vulnerability assessment.
Al-Adamat, R.A.N., Foster, I.D.L. and S.M.J. Baban (2003). Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping for the basaltic aquifer of the Azraq basin of Jordan using GIS, remote sensing and DRASTIC. Applied Geography, 23: 303–324.
Aller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, H. and R.J. Petty (1985). ‘DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings’. USEPA, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Ada, OK. EPA/600/2-85/0108, 163 pp.
Babiker, I.S., Mohamed, A.M., Hiyama, T. and K. Kato (2005). A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, Central Japan. Science Total Environment, 345: 127–140.
Barbash, J.E. and E.A. Resek (1996). Pesticides in Ground Water: Distribution, Trends, and Governing Factors. Chelsea, Michigan: Ann Arbor Press, Pesticides in the Hydrologic System series, 2: 590.
Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I. and B. Wisner (1994). At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters. Routledge, London and New York.
Carsel, R.F., Mulkey, L.A., Lorber, M.H. and L.B. Baskin (1985). The pesticide root zone model (PRZM): A procedure for evaluating pesticide leaching threats to groundwater. Ecological model, 30: 49–69.
Civita, M. (1990). Legenda unificata per le carte della vulnerabilita dei corpi idrici soutterranei (unified legend for the aquifer pollution vulnerability maps). In: Studi sulla vulnerabilita degli Acquiferi. Pitagora, Bologna.
Civita, M., De Maio, M., SINTACS R5 (2000). Quaderni di tecniche di protezione ambientale. Pitagora Editrice. Bologna, 72.
Connell, L.D. and G. van den Daele (2003). A quantitative approach to aquifer vulnerability mapping. Journal of Hydrology, 276: 71–88.
Dixon, B. (2005). Groundwater vulnerability mapping: A GIS and fuzzy rule based integrated tool. Applied Geography,25: 327–347.
Doerfliger, N., Jeannin P.Y. and F. Zwahlen (1999). Water vulnerability assessment in karst environment: a new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools (EPIK method). Environmental Geology, 39(2): 165–176.
Flury, M. (1996). Experimental evidence of transport of pesticides through field soils – A review. Journal of Environmental Quality, 25: 25–45.
Fobe, B. and M. Goossens (1990). The groundwater vulnerability map for the Flemish region: Its principles and uses. Engineering Geology, 29: 355–363.
Fogg, G.E., LaBolle, Eric M. and G.S. Weissmann (1999). Groundwater vulnerability assessment: Hydrogeologic perspective and example from Salinas Valley, California. In: Corwin, D.L, Loague, K. and T.R. Ellsworth (eds), Assessment of non-point source pollution in the vadose zone, Geophysical Monograph, 108: 45–61.
Foster, S.S.D. (1987). Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, the Hague, Proceedings and Information, edited by van Duijvenbooden, W. and G.H. van Waegeningh, 38: 69–86.
Foster, S.S.D. (2002). Groundwater recharge and pollution vulnerability of British aquifers: A critical overview. In: Robins, N.S. (ed.), Groundwater Pollution, Aquifer Recharge and Vulnerability. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 130: 7–22.
Gemitzi, A., Petalas, C., Tsihrintzis, V.A. and V. Pissinaras (2006). Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution: A combination of GIS, fuzzy logic and decision making techniques. Environmental Geology, 49: 653–673.
Gogu, R.C. and A. Dassargues (2000). Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods. Environmental Geolology, 39(6): 549–559.
Goss, D. and R. Wauchope (1992). The SCS/ARS/CES Pesticide Properties Database: II using it with Soils Data in a Screening Procedure. USDA Research Article. USDA, Washington, DC.
Haria, A.H., Hodnett, M.G. and A.C. Johnson (2003). Mechanisms of groundwater recharge and pesticide penetration to a chalk aquifer in Southern England. Journal of Hydrology, 275(1–2): 122-137.
Holman, I.P., Dubus, I.G., Hollis, J.M. and C.D. Brown (2004). Using a linked soil model emulator and unsaturated zone leaching model to account for preferential flow when assessing the spatially distributed risk of pesticide leaching to groundwater in England and Wales. The Science of the Total Environment, 318(1–3): 73–88.
Jarvis, N. (1991). MACRO: A model of water movement and solute transport in macroporous soils. Reports and Dissertations 19, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Department of Soil Science.
Jury, W.A. and M. Ghodrati (1989). Overview of organic chemical environmental fate and transport modelling approaches. In: Reactions and Movement of Organic Chemicals in Soils. B.L. Sawhney and K. Brown (eds), Madison, Wisconsin: Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Special Publication, 22: 271–304.
Kelly, P.M. and W.N. Adger (2000). Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change, 47: 325–352.
Leonard, R.A., Knisel, W.G. and D.A. Still (1987). GLEAMS: groundwater loading effects of agricultural management systems. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 30: 1403–1418.
Massone, H., Londoño, M.Q. and D. Martínez (2010). Enhanced groundwater vulnerability assessment in geological homogeneous areas: A case study from the Argentine Pampas. Hydrogeology Journal, 18: 371–379.
Meeks, Y.J. and J.D. Dean (1990). Evaluating groundwater vulnerability to pesticides. Journal of Water Resource Plan Management, 116(5): 693–707.
Merchant, J.W. (1994). GIS-based groundwater pollution hazard assessment – a critical review of the DRASTIC model. Photogram Engineering Remote Sensing, 60: 1117– 1128.
Morgan, L. (2002). Aquifer vulnerability analysis using the pesticide root-zone model (PRZM2), Washington (State). Department of Ecology. Watershed Management Section.
National Research Council (NRC) (1993). Ground water vulnerability assessment: Contamination potential under conditions of uncertainty. Committee on Techniques for Assessing Ground Water Vulnerability, Water Science and technology Board, Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
Nobre, R.C.M., Rotunno, F.O.C., Mansur, W.J., Nobre, M.M.M. and C.A.N. Cosenza (2007). Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping using GIS, modelling and a fuzzy logic tool. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 94:277–292.
Piñeros Garcet, J.D., Ordoñez, A., Roosen, J. and M. Vanclooster (2006). Metamodelling: Theory, concepts and application to nitrate leaching modelling. Ecological Modelling, 193: 629–644.
Rao, P., Hornsby, A. and R. Jessup (1985). Indices for ranking the potential for pesticide contamination of groundwater. Con Soil Crop Science Society Florida, 44: 1–8.
Richert, S.E., Young, S.E. and C. Johnson (1992). SEEPAGE: a GIS model for groundwater pollution potential. ASAE, St Joseph, Michigan. Paper no. 922592.
Robins, N., Adams, B., Foster, S. and R. Palmer (1994). Groundwater vulnerability mapping: The British pers- pective. Hydrogéologie, 3: 35–42.
Secunda, S., Collin, M. and A.J. Mellou (1998). Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive land use in Israel. Journal of Environmental Management, 54: 39–57.
Shipitalo, M.J., Dick, W.A. and W.M. Edwards (2000). Conservation tillage and macropore factors that affect water movement and the fate of the chemicals. Soil Tillage Research, 53: 167–183.
Soutter, M. and Y. Pannatier (1996). Groundwater vulnerability to pesticide contamination on a regional scale. In Applications of GIS to the Modeling of Non-point Source Pollutants in the Vadose Zone. Environmental Quality, 25: 439–444.
Teso, R.R., Poe, M.P., Younglove T. and P.M. McCool (1996). Use of logistic regression and GIS modelling to predict groundwater vulnerability to pesticides. Journal of Environmental Quality, 25: 425–432.
Teso, R.R., Younglove, T., Peterson, M.R., Sheeks, D.L. and R.E. Gallavan (1988). Soil taxonomy and surveys: Classification of areal sensitivity to pesticide contamination of groundwater. Journal of soil and water conservation,43: 348–352.
Tesoriero, A.J., Inkpen, E.L. and F.D. Voss (1998). Assessing ground-water vulnerability using logistic regression. Proceedings for the Source Water Assessment and Protection 98 Conference, Dallas, TX; 157– 165.
Tiktak, A., Boesten, J.J.T.I., Linden, A.M.A. and M. Vanclooster (2006). Mapping Ground Water Vulnerability to Pesticide Leaching with a Process-Based Metamodel of EuroPEARL. Journal of Environmental Quality, 35: 1213–1226.
Troiano, J., Nordmark, C., Barry, T. and B. Johnson (1997). Profiling areas of ground water contamination by pesticides in California: Phase II—evaluation and modification of a statistical model. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 45: 301–318.