Regionalization of Storm Duration for Determining Derived Flood Frequency Curve: A Case Study for Victoria in Australia
A holistic approach of design flood estimation such as the Monte Carlo simulation technique involves the simulation of thousands of storm and runoff events to determine a derived flood frequency curve. The implementation of such a technique requires the specification of the distributions of various input variables to the rainfall runoff model such as storm duration, storm intensity and initial and continuing losses. This paper presents a case study which focuses on the regionalization of the distribution of storm duration in the state of Victoria, Australia. This in particular compares the one-parameter exponential and two-parameter Gamma distributions in approximating the distribution of storm duration from 91 pluviograph stations in Victoria. Based on the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Anderson–Darling tests, it has been found that the two-parameter Gamma distribution provides a better fit to the storm duration data in Victoria than the one-parameter exponential distribution. The application of the fitted Gamma distribution in the Monte Carlo simulation technique for generating flood frequency curves shows that this approximates the observed flood frequency curves for the selected test catchments quite well. The methodology presented in this paper can be adapted to other states of Australia or other countries, in particular where a sufficient quantity of continuous rainfall and stream flow data are available. This would particularly be useful in hydrological study of the important/large water infrastructure projects.
Alam, J.B., Uddin, M., Ahmed, J.U., Rahman, M.H., Banik, B.K., Yasmin, N. and M.S. Islam (2008). Study of the Morphological change of the River Old Brahmaputra and its impacts. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 6(1): 11–19.
Apel, H., Thieken, A.H., Merz, B. and G. Bloschl (2004). Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty. Journal of Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences, 4: 295–308.
Aronica, G.T. and A. Candela (2007). Derivation of flood frequency curves in poorly gauged Mediterranean catchments using a simple stochastic hydrological rainfall-runoff model. Journal of Hydrolology, 347: 132–142.
Becker, S., Gemmer, M. and T. Jiang (2006). Spatiotemporal analysis of precipitation trends in the Yangtze River catchment. Stoch Environ Res Risk A., 20: 435–444. doi: 10.1007/s00477-006-0036-7.
Blasone, R., Madsen, H. and D. Rosbjerg (2008). Uncertainty assessment of integrated distributed hydrological models using GLUE with Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. Journal of Hydrology, 353: 18–32.
Boyd, M.J., Rigby, E. and R. VanDrie (2001). WBNM Version 3.00, Runoff routing model for floods on natural, urban and part urban catchments. University of Wollongong, Australia.
Carrasco, I.J. and S. Yuh Chang (2005). Random Monte Carlo simulation analysis and risk assessment for ammonia concentrations in wastewater effluent disposal. Stoch Environ Res Risk A., 19: 134–145.
doi:10.1007/s00477-004-0221-5.
Carroll, D.G. (2001). URBS – A catchment runoff routing and flood forecasting model. Version 3.9 User Manual, 2001, Don Carroll Pty Ltd, Queensland, Australia.
Chaudhury, S. and S. Chattopadhyay (2006). Autoregressive model for flood forecasting. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 3(1): 111–114.
Eagleson, P.S. (1972). Dynamics of flood frequency. Water Resour Res., 8(4): 878–898.
Iacobellis, V. and M. Fiorentino (2000). Derived distribution of floods based on the concept of partial area coverage with a climate appeal. Water Resour Res., 36(2): 469–482.
Institution of Engineers Australia (IE Aust) (2001). In: Pilgrim DH (ed) Australian Rainfall and Runoff: a guide to flood estimation. vol 1, IE Aust, Canberra.
Kottegoda, N.T. and R Rosso (1997). Statistics, Probability, and Reliability for Civil and Environmental Engineers, McGraw-Hill.
Kuczera, G. and P. Coombes (2002). Towards continuous simulation: A comparative assessment of flood performance of volume-sensitive systems, Proc. Sixth Regional Conference on Urban Stormwater Management, Stormwater Industry Association, 2002, Orange, NSW, Australia.
Kuczera, G., Lambert, M., Heneker, T., Jennings, S., Frost, A. and P. Coombes (2003). Joint Probability and Design Storms at the Crossroads. Keynote paper. 28th International Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, 2003, 11–13 November, Wollongong, Australia.
Laurenson, E.M. and R.G. Mein (1997). RORB Version 4 Runoff Routing Program User Manual, Dep. of Civil Eng., Monash University, 186 pp.
Muzik, I. (2002). A first-order analysis of the climate change effect on flood frequencies in a subalpine watershed by means of a hydrological rainfall-runoff model. Journal of Hydrology, 267: 65–73.
Natale, L. and F. Siva (2007). Monte Carlo analysis of probability of inundation of Rome. Env Mod and Soft, 22(10): 1409–1416. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.12.004.
Prudhomme, C., Jakob, D. and C. Svensson (2003). Uncertainty and climate change impact on the flood regime of small UK catchments. Journal of Hydrology, 277: 1–23.
Rahman, A., Weinmann, P.E., Hoang, T.M.T. and E.M. Laurenson (2002a). Monte Carlo Simulation of flood frequency curves from rainfall. Journal of Hydrology, 256(3–4): 196–210.
Rahman, A., Weinmann, P.E. and R.G. Mein (2002b). The use of probability-distributed initial losses in design flood estimation. Aust J Water Resour, 6(1): 17–30.
Stephens, M.A. (1974). EDF statistics for goodness-of-fit and some comparisons. J American Stat Assoc., 69(377): 730–737.
Uhlenbrook, S., Sei.bert, J., Leibundght, C. and A. Rodhe (1999). Prediction uncertainty of conceptual rainfall-runoff models caused by problems in identifying model parameters and structure. Hydrol Sci J., 44(5): 779–797.
Weinmann, P.E., Rahman, A., Hoang, T.M.T., Laurenson, E.M. and R.J. Nathan (2002). Monte Carlo simulation of flood frequency curves from rainfall – the way ahead. Aust J Water Resour., 6(1): 71–80.
Yue, S. (2000). The Gumbel mixed model applied to storm frequency analysis. Water Resour Manag., 14: 377–389.