Biofilm Characteristics and Compositions in Fluidized Porcelanite Bioreactors: An Experimental Work
Two systems of Fluidized Porcelanite Bioreactors (FPBR) were designed and constructed atAl-Rustamiyah Sewage Treatment Plant, South of Baghdad. The first system consists of Upflow Expanded Bed Reactor (UEBR) which is connected in sequence with aerated fluidized bed reactor (AFBR), while the other system is composed of two identical upflow expanded reactors operated in parallel. In order to evaluate the biofilm compositions and its characteristics on Porcelanite aggregates or fragment surfaces, an experimental measurements of the biofilm formation using the light microscopy in fixed media have been undertaken. Systems operation consists of various distinct phases, where influent substrate concentrations were taken from primary sewage and clarifier effluent of Al- Rustamiyah sewage.
Three effective parameters, that could influence the rate of biofilm growth such as superficial velocity, substrate, and biomass concentration, were investigated. The rate of biofilm was tested in two types of aeration; the first one was aerated directly compared with second one, which was operated by indirect aeration. Also the rate of biofilm losses for different influent flow rates, substrate concentrations, locations of packing bed in the reactor, and the periods of operation was evaluated. This work showed the main following conclusions:
- The physical, chemical and biological analyses depend on the environmental conditions to which the attachment surface is The large portion of biofilm composition was water with 90.4%, and with a small value of volatile fraction ranged to 9.2%, while the fixed fraction is composed of 0.4% of total biofilm by mass.
- Organic and chemical composition of the fixed fraction of biofilm was determined, where the primary constituentsí carbon (C) was to be 58%, and nitrogen (N) to be 15%, and phosphorus (P) to be 2%, while the fixed solid composition was 25%.
- The inorganic composition of fixed fraction of biofilm varies with chemical and organic properties of bulk water, chemical and physical properties of media, which composes mainly of silica with (45%), and with Fe+2(20%), Mn+2 (14%), Al+3 (10%), Ca+2 (6%) and Mg+2 (5%).
Atkinson, B., Black, G.M. and A. Pinches (1981). The characteristics of solid supports and biomass supports particles when used in fluidized beds. In: Biological fluidized bed treatment of water and wastewater. pp. 75ñ 106, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, England.
Bryers, J.D. and W.G. Characklis (1992). Biofilm Laboratory Methods: The Use of Flow Reactors. In: Melo, L.F., Bott, T.R., Fletcher, M. and Capdeville, B. (Eds.), Biofilmsó Science and Technology, NATO Advanced Studies Institute Series Vol. 223, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 615-630.
Characklis, W.G. (1973). Attached Microbial Growths. I. Attachment and Growth. Water Res, 7: 1113-1127.
Characklis, W.G. (1981). Fouling Biofilm Development: A Process Analysis. Biotechn. Bioengineer, XXIII: 1960- 1981.
Cooper, P.F. and D.H.V. Wheeldon (1981). Complete treatment of sewage in two fluidized bed system. In: Biological fluidized bed treatment of water and wastewater. pp. 121- 144, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, England.
Costerton, J.W. (1999). Introduction to Biofilm. Intern. J. of Antimicrobial Agents, 11: 217-221.
Costerton, J.W. and M. Wilson (2004). Introducing Biofilms. Biofilms, 1: 1-4.
Cunningham, A.B., Characklis, W.G., Abedeen, F. and D. Crawford (1991). Influence of Biofilm Accumulation on Porous Media Hydrodynamics. Envin. Sci. Tech., 25(7): 1305-1311.
Geesey, G.G., Stupy, M.W. and P.J. Bremer (1992). The Dynamics of Biofilms. Intern. Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 30: 135-154.
Huang, C-T., Peretti, S.W. and J.D. Bryers (1992). Use of Flow Cell Reactors to Quantify Biofilm Formation Kinetics. Biotechn. Techniques, 6: 193-198.
Huang, C-.T., Stewart, P.S. and G.A. McFeters (1998). The Study of Microbial Biofilms by Classical Fluorescent Microscopy. In: Wilkinson, M.H.F. and Schut, F. (eds.) Digital and Image Analysis of Microbes: Image, Morphometry, Fluorometry and Motility Techniques and Applications. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 411-429.
Lewandowski, Z. (2000). Structure and Function of Biofilms. In: Evans, L.V. (ed), Biofilms: Recent Advances in Their Study and Control. Harwood Academic Publishers, pp. 1- 17.
Murga, R., Stewart, P.S. and D. Daly (1995). Quantitative Analysis of Biofilm Thickness Variability. Biotechn. Bioengineer, 45: 503-510.
Purevdorj, B. and P. Stoodley (2004). Biofilm Structure, Behavior, and Hydrodynamics. In: Ghannoum, M.A. and OíToole G. (eds.), Microbial Biofilms. ASM Press, Washington, DC, pp. 160-173.
Rittmann, B.E. (1982). Comparative performance of biofilm reactor types. Biotechn. and Bioengineer, 24: 1341-1370.
Rittmann, B.E. and P.L. McCarty (1980b). Evaluation of steady-state biofilm kinetics. Biotechn. and Bioengineer, 22: 235.
Rittmann, B.E. and P.L. McCarty (1980a). Model of steady- state biofilm. Biotechn. and Bioengineer, 22: 235.
Scheuerman, T.R., Camper, A.K. and M.A. Hamilton (1998). Effects of Substratum Topography on Bacterial Adhesion. J.Colloid Interface Science, 208: 23-33.
Trulear, M.G. and W.G. Characklis (1979). Dynamics of Biofilm Processes. Proc. 34th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University, pp. 838-853.