Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in Potable Water Production: An Analysis of Green House Gases Emission from Chemicals and Electricity Usage in Water Treatment in Malaysia
It is undeniable that we cannot live without water. Safe and clean water supply is crucial to human life activities. It is estimated that 80 per cent of all diseases and more than a third of death in this world is caused by using contaminated water. Constant effort that started in the 1980s has brought water services and sanitation to hundreds of millions of the poor population of the world. Among the efforts are the launch of Sanitation Century and International Drinking Water supply in 1981 resulting in the Mar del Plata Action Plan used by the United Nations. But do we know that to produce clean drinking water, chemicals and electricity are needed? Life cycle assessment (LCA) has found that the chemicals and electricity generation in the drinking water production has the potential of releasing green house gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, carbon monoxide and dinitrogen monoxide. Thus raising the dilemma between basic necessity and the issue of saving the world from the impact of climate change. The use of LCA as a tool to achieve sustainable development could detect weaknesses in any system studied. Analysis has shown that the electricity generation using natural gas fuel emits the highest green house gases such as carbon dioxide (95.26%) and methane (4.47%) while PAC contributes the lowest. This situation should be solved by using electricity generated from alternative sources such as photovoltaic and hydroelectric that emits less green house gases.
Amir Hamzah, S., Noor Zalina, M., and S. Abdul Halim (2008a). 29-30 October. Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) of Potable Water Production. Paper presented at the National Conference in Environment and Health, Kota Bharu, Kelantan.
Amir Hamzah, S., Noor Zalina, M. and S. Abdul Halim (2008b). 10-12 December. Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) of Potable Water Production in Malaysia: A Comparison between Different River Class. Paper presented at the Eighth Conference on Ecobalance 08, Tokyo Big Sight, Japan.
Amir Hamzah, S., Noor Zalina, M. and S. Abdul Halim (2008c). Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) of Potable Water Production in Malaysia: A Comparison among Different Technology used in Water Treatment Plant. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Environmental Management 2008: Hazardous-Environmental Management Toward Sustainability, Nakorn Nayok, Thailand.
Amir Hamzah, S., Noor Zalina, M. and S. Abdul Halim (2008d). 7-8 November. Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) of Potable Water Production in Malaysia: A Comparison of Water Level Supply. Paper presented at the 10th Symposium of the Malaysian Society of Applied Biology: Realization of Biodiversity Potentials Through Applied Biology, Kuching, Sarawak.
Amir Hamzah, S., Noor Zalina, M. and S. Abdul Halim (2008e). 5-6 August. Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) of Potable Water Treatment Process in Malaysia: Comparison between Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) and Ultrafiltration (UF) Technology. Paper presented at the Third Regional Symposium on Environment and Resources: Conservation for a green future, Kuala Lumpur.
Bovea, M.D.and A. Gallardo (2006). The influence of impact assessment methods on materials selection for eco-design. Materials and Design, 27: 209-215.
Consoli, F., Allen, D., Boustead, I., Fava, J., Franklin, W., Quay, B. et al. (1993). Guideline for life cycle assessment: A code of practice. Sesimbra, Portugal: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry workshop report.
34 Amir Hamzah Sharaai et al. Economic Planning Unit (2006). Ninth Malaysia Plan 2006-2010. Putra Jaya: Prime Minister’s Department, Malaysia.
Guinée, J. B. (2002). Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. Springer.
Hauschild, M. (2007). Why LCA? [Powerpoint presentation]. Technical University of Denmark: Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Management, Denmark.
Hauschild, M., Jeswiet, J. and L. Alting (2005). From Life Cycle Assessment to Sustainable Production: Status and Perspective. Annals of the CIRP, 54/2/2005, 535-555.
Huijbregts, M.A.J., Breedveld, L., Huppes, G., Koning, A.d., Oers, L.v. and c, S.S. (2003). Normalisation figures for environmental life-cycle assessment. The Netherlands (1997/1998), Western Europe (1995) and the world (1990 and 1995). Journal of Cleaner Production, 11: 737-748.
ISO 14000. (2000). Malaysian standards handbook on environmental management: MS ISO 14000 Series - 2nd Ed. Shah Alam, Malaysia: SIRIM.
Miettinen, P. and R.P. Hamalainen (1997). How to benefit from decision analysis in environmental life cycle assessment (LCA). European Journal of Operational Research, 102: 279-294.
Pennington, D.W., Potting, J., Finnveden, G., Lindeijer, E., Jolliet, O., Rydberg, T. et al. (2004). Life cycle assessment part 2: Current impact assessment practice. Environment International, 30: 721-739.
Soares, S.R., Toffoletto, L. and L. Deschenes (2006). Development of weighting factors in the context of LCIA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14: 649-660.