Response of Membrane Bioreactor to Feed Starvation Shock Load
The impact of feed starvation condition on the biological characteristics and the performance of an aerobic submerged Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) system was investigated. The synthetic wastewater treated in MBR under steady-state condition showed 95% removal of COD, 98% removal of TOC and suspended solids, 88% of TKN removal and 30% removal of phosphate. The system was subjected to a feed starvation shock load for five days and the response of the system in the process of recovering back to pre-shock steady-state condition was studied. After five days of shock loading, the effluent quality deteriorated showing traces of substrate leakage in effluent, large fraction of biomass wash off and reduction in microbial activity inside the reactor. The biological solids in the reactor reduced gradually from 15 g/L to 6 g/L, which took around a month for the biomass to revert back to its normal growth phase. The system required seven days to recover back to steady condition. Overall, the study showed a faster recovery of organic, solid, nutrients removal; however, the system took a month to regain the amount of biomass lost during feed starvation shock load.
Gaudy, Anthony, F. Jr. and Elizabeth T. Gaudy (1981). Microbiology for Environmental Scientists and Engineers. McGraw Hill International Book Company.
APHA (1998). Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 20th Edition. APHA, Washington DC, USA.
Cicek, N. (2003). A review of membrane bioreactors and their potential application in the treatment of agricultural wastewater. Can. Biosys. Eng., 45: 6.37-6.46.
Coello Oviedo, M.D., Lopez-Ramirez, J.A., Sales Marquez, D. and J.M. Quiroga Alonso (2003). Evolution of an activated sludge system under starvation condition. Chemical Engineering Journal, 94: 139-146.
Kjellberg, S., Hermansson, M., Marden, P. and G.W. Jones (1987). The transient phase between growth and non-growth of heterotrophic bacteria with emphasis on the marine environment. ANN. Rev. Microbiology, 41: 25-49.
Kristinn Cameron Frederickson (2005). The Application of Membrane Bioreactor for wastewater treatment on a Northern Manitoban Aboriginal community. Master of Science Thesis.
Li, Z.H., Kuba, T. and T. Kusuda (2006). The influence of starvation phase on the properties and the development of aerobic granules. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 38: 670-674.
Monti, S., Belli, L., Pavan, P., Battistoni, P. and F. Cecchi (2001). Proc 1st International Symposium Membranes, Tel Aviv.
Sponza, D.T. (2002). Extracellular polymeric substances and physiochemical properties of flocs in steady and unsteady state activated sludge systems. Process Biochemistry, 37: 983-998.
Trouve, E., Urbain, V. and J. Manem (1994). Treatment of municipal wastewater by a membrane bioreactor: results of a semi industrial pilot scale study. Water Science Technology, 21: 43-54.
Visvanathan, C., Ben Aim, R. and K.M. Parameshwaran (2000). Membrane separation bioreactor for wastewater treatment. Critical Review Environmental Science Technology, 30(1).
Xia Huang, Rui Lui and Yi Qian (2000). Behaviour of soluble microbial products in a membrane bioreactor. Process Biochemistry, 36: 401-406.
Yamamoto, K., Hiasa, M., Mahmood, T. and T. Matuso (1989). Direct solid-liquid separation using hollow membrane in an activated sludge aeration tank. Water Science and Technology, 21(4): 43-54.
Ye, Y., Le Clech, P., Chen, V. and A.G. Fane (2005). Evolution of fouling during cross flow filtration of model EPS solution. Journal of Membrane Science, 264: 190-199.