Estimating the Budgetary Impact of Higher Willingness to Pay for Residential Water Using CVM: A Case Study of Mauritius
The paper attempts to ascertain the feasibility of reducing potable water deficits by charging residential consumers higher prices. The Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) is used to find out whether an upward revision of residential water tariffs would be compatible with consumer preferences and hence also politically feasible. Survey techniques using dichotomous choice format questions have been employed to elicit respondents’ willingness to pay (WTP) for improved water services. The bid variable is found to be statistically significant in both the bivariate and multivariate logit models. Moreover, mean and median WTP estimates generated from these models are found to be much higher than what would be required by the first best standard (long run marginal cost) and the second best (average cost).
Berndt, E.R. (1991). The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, United States.
Boland, J.J. and D. Whittington (2000). The Political Economy of Water Tariff Design in Developing Countries: Increasing Block Tariffs versus Uniform Price with Rebate. In: The Political Economy of Water Pricing Reforms, Ariel Dinar (ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Central Statistical Office (CSO) (Various Issues). Annual Digest of Statistics. Government of Mauritius, Port-Louis, Mauritius.
Central Water Authority (CWA) (Various Issues). Annual Reports and Accounts. Saint-Paul, Mauritius.
Griffin, C., Briscoe, J., Singh, B., Ramasubban, R. and R. Bhatia (1995). Contingent valuation and actual behavior: Predicting connections to new water systems in the state of Kerala, India. World Bank Economic Review, 9: 373-395.
Haab, T. and K.E. McConnell (2002). Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation. New Horizons in Environmental Economics Series. Cheltenham, UK.
Hanemann, W.M. (1989). Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses data: Reply. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71: 1057-1061.
Loomis, J.B. (1989). Test-Retest reliability of the contingent valuation method: A comparison of general population and visitor responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71: 76-84.
Loomis, J.B., Kent, P., Strange, L., Faush, K. and A. Covich (2000). Measuring the economic benefit of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecological Economics, 33(1): 103-117.
Madhoo, Y.N. (2001). Pricing Policy for Water Resources with Special Reference to Water Utilities in Mauritius. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Mauritius, Le Réduit, Mauritius.
Madhoo, Y.N. (2004). Political economy of water pricing policy: Empirical evidence from public utilities in Mauritius. Water Resources Research, 40(7): W07301, doi: 10.1029/2003WR002903, pp. 1-9.
Madhoo, Y.N. (2005). Demographic and regional dimensions of redistributive impact of residential water charges: The case of Mauritius. Paper presented at the 52nd Conference of the North American Regional Science International held at University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA, November 10-12, 2005.
Saunders, R., Warford, J.J. and P.C. Mann (1977). Alternative concepts of marginal cost pricing for public utility pricing: Problems of application in the water supply sector. World Bank Staff Working Paper 259, Washington, D.C.
Whittington, D. (1992). Possible adverse effects of increasing block water tariffs in developing countries. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 41: 75-87.