AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Volume 4 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.3233/AJW-2007-4_2_04
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Enhancement of Productivity in Reverse Osmosis Desalination Processes

Abderrahim Abbas1
Show Less
1 Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering University of Bahrain, PO Box 32038, Bahrain
AJWEP 2007, 4(2), 23–29; https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-2007-4_2_04
Submitted: 20 October 2005 | Accepted: 15 June 2006 | Published: 1 January 2007
© 2007 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

The steady-state and periodic performances of a seawater desalination unit based on a small-scale commercial spiral-wound membrane were studied. For the steady-state case, operating pressures ranging from 30 bar to 50 bar and temperatures ranging from 22°C to 28°C were investigated. As expected, increasing the pressure resulted in improvements in the water recovery, salt rejection and energy consumed by the feed pump per m3 of permeate produced. The improvements were larger for operation at low to moderate pressures than at high pressures. Both the permeation rate and salt rejection changed linearly with temperature; the permeate flux increased by 2.8%/°C whereas the salt rejection decreased by 0.007%/°C. For the case of unsteady-state operation, the operating pressure was varied according to a symmetric square wave function around an average pressure of 50 bar. The production rate increased as the period of the wave decreased. Such an improvement was obtained at the expense of a marginal increase in the total energy consumed. For a wave period of two minutes, the production rate increased by 8% over that obtained from steady-state operation while the energy consumed increased by a mere 0.15%. A simple theoretical analysis showed that a 12.3% improvement in the permeation rate would be obtained in the absence of concentration polarization. The salt rejection was not affected by this mode of operation.

Keywords
Reverse osmosis
spiral-wound membranes
seawater desalination
membrane performance
periodic operation
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References


Al-Bastaki, N. and A. Abbas (1998). Periodic operation of a reverse osmosis water desalination unit. Sep. Sc. Techn. 33: 2531-2540.

Al-Bastaki, N. and A. Abbas (2001). Use of fluid instabilities to enhance membrane performance: A review. Desalination, 136: 255-262.

Andrianne, J. and F. Alardin (2003). Thermal and membrane processes economics: Optimized selection for seawater desalination. Desalination, 153: 305-311.

Bhattacharjee, S., Kim, A.S. and M. Elimelech (1999). Concentration polarization of interacting solute particles in crossflow membrane filtration. J. Colloid and Interface Science, 4: 81-99.

Colman, D.A. and W.S. Mitchell (1990). Enhanced mass transfer for membrane processes. IChemE Symp. Series, 118: 119-133.

Damak, K., Ayadi, A., Zeghmati B. and P. Schmitz (2004). Concentration polarisation in tubular membranes—A numerical approach. Desalination, 171: 139-153.

Douglas, J.M. (1972). Process Dynamics, Vol. 2, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

Erkoç, E., Yapici, S., Keskinler, B., Çakici, A. and G. Akay (2002). Effect of pulsed flow on the performance of carbon felt electrode. Chem. Eng. J., 85: 153-160.

Fjeld, M. and T. Kristiansen (1969). Optimization of a nonlinear distributed parameter system using periodic boundary control. Int. J. Cont., 10: 601-624.

Ilias, S. and R. Govind (1990). Potential applications of pulsed flow for minimizing concentration polarization in ultrafiltration. Sep. Sci. Techn., 25: 1307-1324.

Kennedy, T.J., Merson, R.L. and B.J. McCoy (1974). Improving permeation flux by pulsed reverse osmosis. Chem. Eng. Sci., 29: 1927-1931.

Lange, R., Schubert, M., Dietrich, W. and M. Grünewald (2004). Unsteady-state operation of trickle-bed reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci., 59: 5355-5361.

Lau, A., Crittenden, B.D. and R.W. Field (2004). Enhancement of liquid phase adsorption column performance by means of oscillatory flow: An experimental study. Sep. Purif. Techn., 35: 113-124.

Luyben, W.L. (1990). Process Modeling, Simulation and Control for Chemical Engineers, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, Singapore.

Rautenbach, R. (1986). Process design and optimization. In: Bungay, P.M., Lonsdale, H.K. and de Pinho, M.N. (eds.), Synthetic membranes: Science, engineering and applications. Kluwer, New York.

Semiat, R. (2000). Desalination: Present and future. Water International, 25: 54-65.

Silveston, P.L. (1991). Catalytic oxidation of carbon monoxide under periodic operation. Can. J. Chem. Eng., 69: 1106-1120.

Soltanieh, M. and W. Gill (1981). Review of reverse osmosis membranes and transport models. Chem. Eng. Education, 12: 279-285.

Sourirajan, S. (1970). Reverse osmosis. Academic Press, New York.

Spiazzi, E., Lenoir, J. and A. Grangeon (1993). A new generator of unsteady-state flow regime in tubular membranes as an anti-fouling technique: A hydrodynamic approach. J. Membr. Sci., 80: 49-57.

Van der Bruggen, B. and C. Vandecasteele (2002). Distillation vs. membrane filtration: Overview of process evolutions in seawater desalination. Desalination, 143: 207-218.

Wangnick, K. (2002). IDA Worldwide Desalting Plants Inventory Report No. 17. Wangnick Consulting GmbH, Gnarrenburg, Germany.

Winzeler, H.B. and G. Belfort (1993). Enhanced performance for pressure-driven membrane processes: The argument for fluid instabilities. J. Membr. Sci., 80: 35-47.

Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing