AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Volume 3 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.3233/AJW-2006-3_1_22
RESEARCH ARTICLE

An Appraisal of Globalization and Sustainable Development for European Countries

Manouchehr Vaziri1 Amir Abbas Rassafi2*
Show Less
1 Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2 Faculty of Engineering, International University, Ghazvin, Iran
AJWEP 2006, 3(1), 147–152; https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-2006-3_1_22
Submitted: 12 December 2004 | Accepted: 17 May 2005 | Published: 1 January 2006
© 2006 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

The contemporary issues of sustainable development and globalization for a subset of European countries are addressed. The paper evaluates these two issues at the national level when some development specialists argue that there is often a trade-off between them. The study database consisted of last two decades relevant national indicators extracted from centralized information sources of international agencies. Due to incomplete and missing data, only 22 countries were selected for detailed analysis for the ten-year period of 1985 to 1995. The globalization indicators reflect cross-border flow and exchange of products, people, resources, and information. The sustainable development indicators reflect human and ecosystem well-beings. They consisted of measures reflecting economic, environmental and social development characteristics. The univariate and multivariate statistical analyses of the database showed interesting results and relations between globalization and sustainable development for the period of study. Elasticities of sustainable development indicators with respect to globalization indicators were studied. For some countries, the elasticity appraisal showed sustainable development parallel with globalization. For others, the evaluation did not indicate a promising period. The study confirmed the significance of the globalization and sustainable development balancing challenges of the 21st century.

Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References

Clarke, R. (ed.) (1999). Global Environment Outlook 2000. UN Environment Programme. UN Publications.

Harris, R.G. (1993). Globalization, Trade, and Income. Canadian Journal of Economics, 26: 755-776.

Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development(OECD) (1999). OECD in Figures, 1999 Edition. OECD Publications.

Ohmae, K. (1995). The End of the Nation State. Free Press, New York, USA.

United Nations (UN) (1997). Statistical Yearbook 1997, 42nd Edition. UN Publications. New York.

Vaziri, M. and A.A. Rassafi (2001). An Appraisal of Road Transport Sustainable Development in the Asian and Pacific Region. In: Proceedings of the International Seminar on Sustainable Development on Road Transport: III.39-III.46, New Delhi, India.

Vaziri, M. and A.A. Rassafi (2001). An Appraisal of Forest Sustainability in the Asian and Pacific Region. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ecosystem & Sustainable Development: 616-621. Wessex Institute of Technology Press, Wessex. UK.

Wallerstein, I. (1994). The Rise and Future Demise of the World-Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16: 387-415.

World Bank (1998). World Development Indicators 1998. World Bank Publications. Washington.

World Commission on Environment and Development(WCED) (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 

Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing