AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Volume 15 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.3233/AJW-180027
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparing Carbon Dioxide Reduction Strategies in Iran  and the European Union Transportation Sector

Fardin Eskaf 1*
Show Less
1 Department of Environmental Engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
AJWEP 2018, 15(2), 153–162; https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-180027
Submitted: 7 September 2017 | Revised: 4 March 2018 | Accepted: 4 March 2018 | Published: 11 May 2018
© 2018 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

The transportation sector represents a major proportion of the global greenhouse gases (GHGs)  emissions. Fossil fuels supply over 95% of total energy used by the world transportation sector and this sector  is responsible for 23% of the world energy related GHGs emissions. Factors such as number of mobile sources  (vehicles), variety of technologies, many consumers with various driving behaviour, and variety of fuels (from  conventional to alternative with different quality) have caused a more complicated situation for decision makers  aiming to develop policies of CO2 emissions reduction in this sector. This study compares European and Iranian  experience in developing carbon dioxide-related policies in transportation sector. Vehicle production in Iran has  grown dramatically during the last decade. But, due to the high energy subsidies on the local market, weak technical  regulations, and low access to new technologies, Iranian automakers have not enhanced the fuel efficiency of new  products as their global counterparts. It is expected that fuel demand in Iran will grow along with the growth of  the motorization rate and fuel efficiency level of the road fleet.

Benchmarking with the European policies along with the SWOT analysis has concluded four strategies as  the core concept of this analysis: mandatory regulation versus voluntary agreement, CO2 emissions versus  fuel consumption regulation, approaching efficient fiscal policies (taxes for conventional and subsidies for low  carbon fuels), and dieselization of the LDVs fleet. The fifth strategy, as national fuel economy regulation, should  be addressed to coordinate the others. In this regards, a set of policy packages should be developed relating to  governmental institutions. It should be mentioned that increasing public awareness should be addressed as the  basic approach of any strategic roadmap in the country

Keywords
Transportation
CO2
policy
Iran
European Union
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References

Air Quality Control Co. (AQCC) (2013). Gasoline and Diesel Quality Impacts on Light and Heavy Duty Vehicle’s Pollution Emissions. Technical Report No. QM92/03/02(U)/01.

Blumberg, Katherine O., Walsh, Michael P. and Charlotte Pera (2003). Low-Sulfur Gasoline & Diesel: The Key to Lower Vehicle Emissions. Prepared for the May 2003 meeting in Napa. California. The International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT).

British Petroleum (BP) (2017). BP Statistical Review of World Energy. London. UK. www.bp.com

Capros, P., Mantzos, L., Papandreou,V. and N. Tasios (2008). European Energy and Transport: Trends to 2030 – Update 2007. European Commission. Brussels.

Charles C., Ragin (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press. California. USA.

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) (2014) . International Fuel Prices 2012/2013 . Germany. 8: 36.

European Environment Agency (EEA) (2011). Laying the foundations for greener transport. Term 2011: Transport indicators tracking progress towards environmental targets in Europe. EEA Report No 7/2011. Copenhagen. Denmark.

European Environment Agency (EEA) (2014). Monitoring CO2 emissions from new passenger cars in the EU: Summary of date for 2013. Copenhagen. Denmark. www.eea.europa.eu/

European Environment Agency (EEA) (2016). Monitoring CO2 emissions from passenger cars and vans in 2015. Luxemburg. www.eea.europa.eu/

European Union (2016 edition). Eurostat Energy Balance Sheets 2014. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Fred, R. David (2011). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. 13th edition. Prentice Hall Publication. New Jersey. USA.

Ilari Karrpi, Merja Kokkonen and Kaisa Lähteenmäki-Smith (2001). SWOT analysis as a basis for regional strategies. Nordregio Working Paper 2001. Stockholm. Sweden. 4: 15.

Institute of Standards & Industrial Research of Iran (ISIRI) (2015). Light Vehicle (Gasoline, Diesel and Bi-fuel) Vehicles – Fuel consumption, criteria for CO2 emission and energy labeling instruction. ISIRI Standard Number 4241-2. 3rd Rev. Tehran. Iran.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007). Fourth Assessment Report. Chapter 5: Transport and its infrastructure. Cambridge. United Kingdom and New York. USA.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014). Fifth Assessment Report. Chapter 8: Transport. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. United Kingdom and New York. USA.

International Energy Agency (IEA) (2016). CO2 Emission from Fuel Combustion: Highlights. Paris. France. www.iea. org/CO2EmissionsfromFuelCombustion_Highlights_2016. pdf

International Energy Agency (IEA) (2013). Energy Prices and Taxes. 1st Quarter 2013. Paris. www.iea.org

International Energy Agency (IEA) (2015). Energy Prices and Taxes. Country Notes. 1st Quarter 2015.

Iran Standard and Quality Inspection Co (ISQI) (2016). Gozaresh-e Haml-o-Naghl va Khadamat 1395. Tehran. www.isqi.co.ir/

Iranian Fuel Conservation Company (IFCO) (2013) . Transportation Energy Data book 2011. Tehran. Iran.

Jansen, J.C. and S.J.A. Bakker (2006) . Social cost- benefit analysis of climate change mitigation options in a European context. Energy Research Center of the Netherland. ECN-E--06-059.

Ministry of Petroleum (MOP) and Institute for International Energy Studies (IIES) (2015). Iran Hydrocarbon Balance 2014.

Natasa Markovska, Verica Taseska and Jordan Pop-Jordanov (2009). SWOT analysis of the national energy sector for sustainable energy development, 34: 752-756.

Ricardo-AEA and Cambridge Econometrics (March 2013). An Econometric Assessment of Low Carbon Vehicles. London. United Kingdom. https://europeanclimate.org/ documents/Cars-Economic-assessment-vehicles-FINAL. pdf.

The European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA). Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers. Truck and Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA),and Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association (JAMA) (2013). The Worldwide Fuel Charter. 5thedition, September 2013.

The International Council for Clean Transport (ICCT) (2014). CO2 emissions from new passenger cars in the EU: Car manufacturers’ performance in 2013.

The International Association for Natural Gas Vehicles (2014). Worldwide NGV statistics. www.ngvjournal.com/ worldwide-ngv-statistics/

Stef Proost (2008). Full Account of the Costs and Benefits of Reducing CO2 Emissions in Transport. OECD/ITF, JTRC Discussion Paper 2008-3.

World Bank (2004) . Islamic Republic of Iran Energy- Environment Review Policy Note. World Bank Report No.29062-IR.

Winston Harrington (2008) . The Design of Effective Regulations of Transport. OECD/ITF. JTRC Discussion Paper 2008-2. www.internationaltransportforum.org.

Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing