Energy Use and Carbon Footprint for Potable Water Treatment in Haiderpur Water Treatment Plant, Delhi, India
With the advent of the environmentally conscious decision-making period, the carbon footprint of any engineering project becomes an important consideration. Despite this, the carbon footprint associated with water resource projects is often overlooked. Water production, its supply and treatment processes involve significant energy consumption and thus, are source of emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) such as carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) which contribute to global warming. The emissions are not direct but come as a by-product of burning of fossil fuels to produce electricity to carry out these processes. Since water demand is continuous and keeps on rising, the quantification of carbon footprint associated with the water industry is vital. This paper studies and attempts to quantify the carbon footprint of one such urban water system, that is the Haiderpur Water Treatment Plant in Delhi, capital region of India by using the Life Cycle Assessment methodology and evaluate its performance from the point of view of energy consumption and make suggestions.
Barjoveanu, G., Comandaru, I.M., Rodriguez-Garcia, G., Hospido, A. and C. Teodosiu (2013). Evaluation of water services system through LCA. A case study for Iasi City, Romania. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(2): 449-462.
Benjaafar, S., Li, Y. and M. Daskin (2013). Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 10(1): 99-116.
Chilana, L., Bhatt, A.H., Najafi, M. and M. Sattler (2016). Comparison of carbon footprints of steel versus concrete pipelines for water transmission. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 66(5): 518-527.
Central Electricity Authority, Ministry of Power, Government of India (2018). CO2 Baseline Database for the Indian Power Sector, https://cea.nic.in/wp-content/uploads/ baseline/2020/07/user_guide_ver14.pdf
Del Borghi, A., Strazza, C., Gallo, M., Messineo, S. and M. Naso (2013). Water supply and sustainability: Life cycle assessment of water collection, treatment and distribution service. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(5): 1158-1168.
Friedrich, E., Pillay, S. and C. Buckley (2009). Carbon footprint analysis for increasing water supply and sanitation in South Africa: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(1): 1-12.
Gautam, S.K., Sharma, D., Tripathi, J.K., Ahirwar, S. and S.K. Singh (2012). A study of the effectiveness of sewage treatment plants in Delhi region. Applied Water Science, 3(1): 57-65.
Gleick, P.H. (1994). Water and energy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment. 19: 267-299.
Godskesen, B., Zambrano, K.C., Trautner, A., Johansen, N.B., Thiesson, L., Andersen, L., Clauson-Kaas, J., Neidel, T.L., Rygaard, M., Kløverpris, N.H. and H.J. Albrechtsen (2010). Life cycle assessment of three water systems in Copenhagen - A management tool of the future. Water Supply, 10(6): 95-960.
Gu, Y., Dong, Y.N., Wang, H., Keller, A., Xu, J., Chiramba, T. and F. Li (2016). Quantification of the water, energy and carbon footprints of wastewater treatment plants in China considering a water–energy nexus perspective. Ecological Indicators, 60: 402-409.
Gupta, D. and S. Singh (2015). Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment plants. International Journal of Environmental Engineering, 7(1): 1-10.
Gupta, D. and S. Singh (2012). Greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment plants: A case study of Noida. Journal of Water Sustainability, 2(2): 131-139.
Gustavsson, D.J.I. and S. Tumlin (2013). Carbon footprints of Scandinavian wastewater treatment plants. Water Science and Technology, 68(4): 887-893.
Haas, D. (2009). Energy and greenhouse gas emissions for the SEQ water strategy. Urban Water Security Research Alliance, Technical Report No. 14.
International Standardization Organization ISO/TS 14067:2013. Greenhouse Gases—Carbon Footprint of Products—Requirements and Guidelines for Quantification and Communication, 1st ed.; International Organization for Standardization, ISO Central Secretariat: Geneva, Switzerland
Liu, J., Chen, S., Wang, H. and X. Chen (2015). Calculation of carbon footprints for water diversion and desalination projects. Energy Procedia, 75: 2483-2494.
Presura, E. and L.D. Robescu (2017). Energy use and carbon footprint for potable water and wastewater treatment. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 11(1): 191-198.
Qi, C. and N.B. Chang (2013). Integrated carbon footprint and cost evaluation of a drinking water infrastructure system for screening expansion alternatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 60: 170-181.
Shrestha, E., Ahmad, S., Johnson, W. and J.R. Batista (2012). The carbon footprint of water management policy options. Energy Policy, 42: 201-212.
Singh, P. and A. Kansal (2018). Energy and GHG accounting for wastewater infrastructure. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128: 499-507.
Singh, S. and Deepika (2015). Water quality index assessment of Bhalswa Lake, New Delhi. International Journal of Advanced Research, 3(5): 1052-1059.
Singh, S. and L. Kumar (2014). Characterization of rural drinking water sources in Bhawani District, Haryana: A case study. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovations, 2(4): 27-37.
Singh, S., Sachdeva, H., Joon, H. and M. Narang (2020). Water quality assessment of a water body using principal component analysis – Sanjay Lake, New Delhi, India. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 17(4): 23-29.
Strutt, J., Wilson, S., Shorney-Darby, H., Shaw, A. and A. Byers (2008). Assessing the carbon footprint of water production. Journal - American Water Works Association, 100(6): 80-91.
Vieira, F. and H.M. Ramos (2009). Optimization of the energy management in water supply systems. Water Supply, 9(1): 59-65.
Zhang, Q., Wang, X., Xiong, J., Chen, R. and B. Cao (2010). Application of life cycle assessment for an evaluation of wastewater treatment and reuse project – Case study of Xi’an, China. Bioresource Technology, 101(5): 1421-1425.