AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Volume 16 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.3233/AJW190024
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Geo-Environmental Assessment for Naturally and  Artificially Contaminated Cohesive Soil Remediated with  Granular Carbon

Hadeel Majid Hussein1,2* Sohail Ayub11 Asif Ali Siddiqui1
Show Less
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Zakir Husain College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh Uttar Pradesh, 202002, India
2 Department of Civil Engineering, Al-Esra’a University College, Baghdad, Iraq
AJWEP 2019, 16(2), 91–99; https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW190024
Submitted: 4 November 2018 | Revised: 13 March 2019 | Accepted: 13 March 2019 | Published: 24 April 2019
© 2019 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

The present study is focused on the ability of granular activated carbon (GC) for reduction of  contaminants in polluted soils and its effect on physical and chemical properties of these soils. The effect of thermal  power plant effluent on soil characteristics was also evaluated by conducting physical and chemical laboratory  experiments. The contaminant was industrial effluent obtained from Al-Musayyib thermal power plant located in  Iraq which is disposed as side product. With percolation of effluent from drainage into the soil, many processes  like physico-chemical decomposition process, ion exchange reactions, chemical alterations, oxidation, hydrolysis  etc. lead to the changes in natural soil properties. For these reasons, two types of soils have been proposed, first  is naturally contaminated soil obtained from the site nearby of drainage channel which is located in Al -Musayyib  power plant discharging industrial effluent for nearly 20 years. The second soil is artificially contaminated soil  obtained from Aligarh (India), at depth “3 m”; the soil was contaminated by mixing with the 15% of the effluent  collected from Al-Musayyib thermal power plant and contaminated for seven days.

Granular carbon was added to the naturally and artificially contaminated soil in proportions of 5 and 10%, by  dry weight of the soil and thoroughly mixed to ensure homogeneity. For physical properties of each percentage  performed by specific gravity, compaction, natural water content, filled and dry density and chemical properties  for two percentages performed by pH, EC, TDS, ORG, Cl, SO4, NO3 and heavy metals. The soil samples were air  dried and crushed and then sieved by 4 mm sieve, then the contaminated soil was mixed with GC which passed  through sieve (1.17 mm). The results in this research showed slight changes in soil properties when mixed with  effluent whereas in naturally contaminated soil, the results showed more changes in geo-environmental properties

Keywords
Granular carbon
contaminant soil
geo-environmental properties
naturally contaminated
artificially contaminated
thermal power plant.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References

Asadi, A., Shariatmadari, N., Moayedi, H. and B.B.K. Huat  (2011). Effect of MSW leachate on soil consistency  under influence of electrochemical forces induced by soil  particles. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 6: 2344-2351.

ASTM (2003). American Society for Testing and Materials,  USA (Different Designation).

BS 1377, Part 1 (1990). British Standard Method of Test of  Soil for Civil Engineering Purposes. 

Cesceri, Lenore S., Greenberg, Arnold E. and Andrew D.  Eaton (2015). Standard Methods for the Examination of  Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. 

Deka, J. and H.P. Sarma (2012). Heavy metal contamination  in soil in an industrial zone and its relation with some  soil properties. Archives of Applied Science Research, 4(2): 831-836.

DR 2800 (2007). Spectrophotometer: Catalog Number  DOC022.53.00725, 2nd ed., standard methods.

Dutta, S.K., Singh, D. and A. Sood (2016). Effect of  soil chemical and physical properties on sorption and  desorption behavior of lead in different soils of India. Soil  and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal.  20: 249-260.

Glewa, S.M. and M. Al-Alwani (2013). Evaluation of the  effect of solid waste leachate on soil at Hilla city. Journal  of Babylon University. 21: 894-906.

Grisso, R.B., Alley, M., Holshouser, D. and W. Thomason  (2009). Soil electrical conductivity. Virginia State  University.

Hasan, R., Hasan, H., Islam, R., Alim, K., Razi, A. and S.  Alam (2013). Changes in geotechnical properties of soil  with pH in household and industrial waste dump site. Int  J App SciEng Res., 2: 119-127.

Hilber, I. and T.D. Bucheli (2010). Activated carbon  amendment to remediate contaminated sediments and  soils: A review. Global NEST Journal, 12: 305-317. 

International Conference on Biological, Civil and  Environmental Engineering (BCEE-2014), Dubai, March  17-18, 148-152 (2014).

Karkush, M.O. and M.S. Abdul Kareem (2015). Behavior  of pile foundation subjected to lateral cyclic loading in  contaminated soils. Journal of Civil Engineering Research,  5(6): 144-150.

Karkush, M.O. and D.A.J. Resol (2015). Studying the  effects of industrial waste water on chemical and physical  properties of sandy soil. Journal of Babylon University, 23.

Loretta, L. (2012). Remediation treatment technologies:  Reference guide for developing countries facing persistent  organic pollutants. 6250 Applied Science Lane, Vancouver,  B.C. V6T 1Z4. The University of British Columbia.

McKenzie, R.M. (1980). The adsorption of lead and other  heavy metals on oxides of manganese and iron. Australian  Journal of Soil Research, 18: 61-73

Oluremi, J.R., Adedokun, S.I., Olaoye, R.A. and S.O.  Ajamu (2012). Assessment of Cassava wastewater on the  geotechnical properties of lateritic soil. The Pacific Journal  of Science and Technology. 13: 631-639.

Patel, A.V.A. (2014). Study on geotechnical properties of  heavy metal contaminated soil. Int J of Res PARIPEX,  3: 62-63.

Pillai, S., Peter, A.E., Sunil B.M. and S. Shri Hari (2014).  Soil pollution near a municipal solid waste disposal site  in India, BCCE-2014, Dubai, UAE. 

Prakash, S. and P.D. Arumairaj (2015). Effects of acid and  base contamination on geotechnical properties of clay.  International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR).  4: 1440-1444.

Praveena, G.S. and P.V.V. Rao (2016). Impact of leachate  on soil properties in the dumpsite (a case study of greater  Visakhapatnam). International Journal of Engineering  Research and General Science, 4: 235-241.

Rahman, Z.A., Hamzah, U., Taha, M.R., Ithnain, N.S. and  N. Ahmad (2010). Influence of oil contamination on  geotechnical properties of basaltic residual soil. American  Journal of Applied Sciences, 7: 954-961.

Rao, A.V.N. and M. Chittaranjan (2012). Effect of certain  industrial effluents on compaction characteristic of anexpansive soil—A comparative study. International  Journal of Engineering Inventions, 1: 22-28.

Scholars Research Library (2012). 4: 831-836 (http:// scholarsresearchlibrary.com/archive.html).

Shehzad, A., Khan, A.H. and Z.U. Rehman (2015).  Characteristics of low plastic clay contaminated by  industrial effluents. Intl. J. Adv. Struc. Geotech. Eng., 4: 138-147.

Sivapullaiah, P.V. (2015). Effects of soil pollution on  geotechnical behavior of soils. Geotide.IGC 2009, Guntur,  India.

Tadza, M.Y. and F. Baharudin (2017). Treatment efficiency  and compressibility behavior. Geomate J., 12: 122-126.

Wang, P., Li, J. and H. Wang (2013). Engineering properties  of heavy metal contaminated soil affected by EDTA  washing. EJGE, 18: 3909-3918.

Worksafe (2005). Victoria: Industry standard contaminated  construction sites contents. First Edition.

Yusuf, A.J., Galadima, A. and I. Nasir (2015). Determination  of some heavy metals in soil sample from Illela garage  in Sokoto state, Nigeria. Research Journal of Chemical  Sciences. 5: 8-10.

Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing