AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Volume 16 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.3233/AJW190008
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluating Traffic-related Near-road CO Dispersions on an Urban Road During Summer Season: A Model Inter-comparison

Shadab Ahmad1* Farhan A. Kidwai1 Kafeel Ahmad1
Show Less
1 Civil Engineering Department, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi – 110025, India
AJWEP 2019, 16(1), 69–79; https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW190008
Submitted: 3 December 2018 | Revised: 7 December 2018 | Accepted: 7 December 2018 | Published: 10 January 2019
© 2019 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Three air pollution models, namely the ‘California Line Source’ (CALINE4) model, the ‘Unique  Dispersion Model’ (UDM) and the ‘Simplified Type Dispersion Model’ (STM) have been analyzed for assessing  the air pollutant concentration at one of the most congested traffic road in the city of New Delhi. The latter two  models have been developed using the most influential input parameters of CALINE4 namely traffic flow and  wind-speed observed by both sensitivity analysis and regression analysis studies. The model performance have  been estimated and compared statistically with the traffic emitted airborne carbon monoxide (CO), the prevalent  meteorology and the temporal distribution of the monitored hourly average CO concentrations in summer time.  The study has displayed that the UDM model would generate better predictions as compared to other models  for different meteorological and traffic conditions. The complete study reveals that the similarity between the  monitored and the modelled CO concentrations have been reasonably satisfactory for UDM and CALINE4 models.  Further detailed assessment confirms that the UDM model performed superior in comparison to the CALINE4.

Keywords
Air quality modelling
CO
vehicular pollution
model evaluation
urban air quality
urban road
model comparison
near-road pollutant dispersion.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References

Ahmad, S., Kidwai, F.A. and K. Ahmad (2018). Prediction  and Analysis of near-road CO Concentrations due to  Heterogeneous Traffic Using a Simplified-type Dispersion  Model. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and  Pollution, 154: 131–142.

ARAI (2008). Draft Report on Emission Factor Development  for Indian Vehicles’, Report Submitted to CPCB/MoEF  as a part of Ambient air quality monitoring and emission  source apportion studies. Automotive Research Association  of India, Pune, India. 

Attri, S.D., Singh, S., Mukhopadhyay, B. and A.K. Bhatnagar  (2008). Atlas of Hourly Mixing Height and Assimilative  Capacity of Atmosphere in India, Met Monograph No.  Environment Meteorology-01/2008, Indian Meteorological  Department, New Delhi, Govt. of India.

Azmi, S.Z., Latif, M.T., Ismail, A.S., Juneng, L. and A.A.  Jemain (2010). Trend and status of air quality at three  different monitoring stations in the Klang Valley, Malaysia.  Air QualAtmos Health., 3(1): 53–64.

Banerjee, T., Barman, S.C. and R.K. Srivastava (2011).  Application of air pollution dispersion modeling for  source-contribution assessment and model performance  evaluation at integrated industrial estate-Pantnagar.  Environmental Pollution, 159: 865–875.

Benson, P.E. (1992). A review of the development and  application of the CALINE3 and -4 models. Atmos  Environ, 26B(3): 379–390.

Benson, P.E. (1982). Modifications to the Gaussian vertical  dispersion parameter, rz, near roadways. Atmos. Environ,  16: 1399–1405.

Benson, P.E. (1989). CALINE4 – A dispersion model for  predicting air pollutant concentrations near roadways.  California Department of Transportation. Report.

Bhanarkar, A., Rao, P.S., Gajghate, D. and P. Nema (2005).  Inventory of SO2 , PM and toxic metals emissions from  industrial sources in Greater Mumbai, India. Atmospheric  Environment, 39(21): 3851–3864. 

Chen, J., Avise, J., Guenther, A., Wiedinmyer, C., Salathe,  E., Jackson, R.B. and B. Lamb (2009). Future land use  and land cover influences on regional biogenic emissions  and air quality in the United States. Atmos. Environ., 43:  5771–5780.

Chen, J., Avise, J., Lamb, B., Salathé, E., Mass, C.,  Guenther, A., Wiedinmyer, C., Lamarque, J.-F., O’Neill,  S., McKenzie, D. and N. Larkin (2009). The effects of  global changes upon regional ozone pollution in the United  States. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9: 1125–1141.

Cox, W.M. and J.A. Tikvart (1990). A statistical procedure  for determining the best performing air quality simulation  model. Atmos. Environ., 24(A): 2387–2395.

CPCB (2000). Transportation Fuel Quality for Year 2005:  Programme Objective Series, PROBES/78/2000-01,  Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi, Govt. of  India.

Dhyani, R. (2017). Performance evaluation and sensitivity  analysis of vehicular pollution dispersion model under  mixed traffic conditions. PhD Thesis. CSIR-Central Road  Research Institute, Academy of Scientific and Innovative  Research, New Delhi.

Dhyani, R. and N. Sharma (2017). Sensitivity Analysis of  CALINE4 Model under Mix Traffic Conditions. Aerosol  and Air Quality Research, 17: 314–329. 

Draxler, R. (1976). Determination of atmospheric diffusion  parameters. Atmos. Environ, 10: 99–105.

Duijm, N.J. and B. Carissimo (2002). Evaluation  methodologies for dense gas dispersion models. In: The  handbook of hazardous materials spills technology. M.  Fingas (ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing