Economic Feasibility Study of Community Scale Reverse Osmosis Plants in Jaipur, Rajasthan
This study presents a performance analysis in terms of energy and other costs related to the unit cost of water produced in 16 identical community scale reverse osmosis units installed at Jaipur.
The energy consumptions indicated that these plants suffer from accelerated fouling of membranes due to scaling by hardness causing substances, which results in a significant loss of useful life of the membranes. The study shows that the overall cost of water production has four major components. Energy cost varies between Rs. 0.025 and 0.079 per litre. Salary cost varies between Rs. 0.04 to 0.20 per litre. Spares and chemical cost varies between Rs. 0.01 to 0.04 per litre. In addition, repayment of capital invested has also been considered with and without solar integration to arrive at realistic cost estimates over a perceived life cycle of the system. The breakeven achieved by selling 4600–5200 litre water @ Rs. 0.2 per litre per day if repayment of capital investment is not considered, as these units were installed under CSR, while it varies between 8800 and 9600 litre if repayment of capital investment is also considered as an independent business venture. This analysis substantiates that potential exists for the long-term sustainability of these systems.
Atab, M.S., Smallbone, A.J. and A.P. Roskilly (2016). An operational and economic study of a reverse osmosis desalination system for potable water and land irrigation. Desalination, 397: 174-184.
BIS: 10500 (2012). Capocelli, M., Prisciandaro, M., Piemonte, V. and D. Barba (2019). A technical-economical approach to promote the water treatment & reuse processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207: 85-96.
Christopher, H.J., John, M., Pablo, K.C., William, H., Chad, J.S. and S. M. Cook (2019) A new framework for small drinking water plant sustainability support and decisionmaking. Science of The Total Environment, 695: 133899.
Emmanuel, A.A. and D.T. Ayentimi (2019). Community-level mechanism and strategies for managing sustainable water supply systems: Lessons from Bongo district of northern Ghana. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 22: 3739-3756.
Goh, P.S., Matsuura, T., Ismail, A.F. and N. Hilal (2016). Recent trends in membranes and membrane process for desalination. Desalination, 391: 43-60.
Hafeez, A., Zufishan, S., Nasir, S., Fahed, J., Tahir, F., Saif, R., Aqeel, A.B. and F. Rehman (2021). Solar powered decentralzed water systems: A cleaner solution of the industrial wastewater treatment and clean drinking water supply challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289: 125717.
Imbrogno, J., Keating IV, J.J., Kilduff, J. and G. Belfort. (2017). Critical aspects of RO desalination : A combination strategy. Desalination, 401: 68-87.
Indian Water Desalination Plants Market Forecast & Opportunities. (2017). Tech Sci Research.
Khaiwal, R., Sarwa, A., Bhatnagar, N., Kaur, R. and S. Mor (2019). Public perception about community reverse osmosis treated water, it’s acceptability and barriers in choice of safe drinking water. Environment, Development and Sustainabilty, 22: 5819-5931.
Manawi, Y., Kochkodan, V., Hussein, M.A., Khaleel, M.A., Khraisheh, M. and N. Hilal (2016). Can carbon-based nanomaterials revolutionize membrane fabrication for water treatment and desalination? Desalination, 391: 69-88.
Pichel, N., Vivar, M. and M. Fuentes (2019). The problem of drinking water access: A review of disinfection technologies with an emphasis on solar treatment methods. Chemosphere. 218: 1014-1030.
Saraswat, S.S. (2017). Report on “Aquifer mapping and ground water management Jaipur district, Rajasthan”. Central Ground Water Board Ministry of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation Government of India. 20-21.
Shenvi, S.S., Isloor, A.M. and A.F. Ismail (2015). A review on RO membrane technology : Developments and challenges. DES, 368: 10-26.
Zhang, J., Northcott, K., Duke, M., Scales, P. and S.R. Gray, (2016). Influence of pre-treatment combinations on RO membrane fouling. Desalination, 393: 120-126