Environmental Impact of Rat-Hole Coal Mines on the Biodiversity of Meghalaya, India
The paper appreciates coal mining laws and policies applied by National Green Tribunal to ban traditional, artisanal and rat-hole coal mining in Jaintia Hills of Meghalaya (a state in India) in an attempt to conserve its environment and biodiversity. Meghalaya represents an important part of the Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot which is one of the four bio-diversity hotspots of India and ranks 34th among the hotspots in the world. It is equally bestowed with rich deposits of coal, which can be found in the Khasi Hills, Garo Hills and Jaintia Hills districts. Coal mining from these districts is labour-intensive and involves digging narrow rat-hole sized tunnels that are four-feet high. The workers enter into the rat-hole in an extremely hazardous manner, setting aside the ergonomic principles for the extraction of coal. The legal framework of coal mining is governed by Mines Act, 1952, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Mineral Concession Rules, 1960, Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1973, Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, 1988 and Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2015. However, these laws are not applied to Meghalaya because of its constitutional status enshrined in Sixth Schedule and Article 244 of the Constitution of India, 1950. Coal mining has brought employment opportunities, tribal sustenance and economic development that led to environmental degradation, disruption of ecosystems and biological diversity. The hazardous pursuits have been bereft of safety and ergonomic principle besides being oblivious of SDF of mining laws and policies in India
Amirmahmoudi, A. and M.Z.M. Nomani (2018). Access and benefit sharing provisions under biodiversity conservation law in Australia and its implications for India. Legal Research Development, 4(2): 35-46.
Amirmahmoudi, A. and M.Z.M. Nomani (2019). South African Model of access and benefit sharing and its implications for India. International Journal of Law, 5(2): 60-64.
Appointment of Mining Consultant (2015, June 17). Meghalaya Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. Ref No. MMDC/MMMP/2014-5578. [Internet]. [cited 21st December 2019c]. Available at: http://megdmg.gov.in/pdf/ MMDC%20appointment%20of%20mining%20consultant. pdf
Chabukdhara, M. and O.P. Singh (2016). Coal mining in Northeast India: An overview of environmental issues and treatment approaches. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 3(2): 87-96.
Chatterjee, S.A., Saikia, P., Dutta, D., Ghosh, Pangging, G. and A.K. Goswami (2006). Biodiversity significance of North East India. WWF India. Delhi, India.
Chauhan, K. and I. Kharumnuid (2016). Institutional policy and its role in sustainable resource management and development: A critical analysis of the ‘NGT’ Ban on Rat-Hole Mining in Meghalaya, India. [Internet]. [cited 3rd December 2019]. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/ sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2819025
Dasgupta S., Tiwari, B.K. and R.S. Tripathi (2002). Coal mining in Jaintia hills, Meghalaya: An ecological perspective. In: Jaintia Hills’ A Meghalaya Tribe: Its Environment, Land and People. Passah, P.M. and Sarma, A.S. (Eds.) Reliance Publishing House, New Delhi, pp. 121-128.
Guha Roy, P.K. (1991). Coal mining in Meghalaya and its impact on environment. Exposure, 4: 31-33.
IIED (2002, April). Mining for the Future. Appendix B: Mine Closure – Working Paper. In: Report Prepared by MMSD. Project of IIED. No. 34 [Internet]. [cited 3rd December 2019]. Available at: http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G00884.pdf (Mining for the Future, 2002, p. B-8).
Illegal mining: Supreme Court orders Meghalaya to deposit Rs 100 crore; Move comes six months after mining disaster in the state [Internet]. [cited 3rd December 2019a]. Available at: https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/ mining/illegal-mining-supreme-court-orders-meghalayato-deposit-rs-100-crore-65424.pdf.]
Jeeva, S., Mishra, B.P., Venugopal, N. and R.C. Laloo (2006). Traditional Knowledge and Biodiversity Conservation in the Sacred Groves of Meghalaya. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 5(4): 563-568.
Lahiri, D.K. (2007). Illegal coal mining in Eastern India: Rethinking legitimacy and limits of justice. Economic and Political Weekly, 8: 57-66.
Meghalaya government favours coal mining regulations [Internet]. [cited 3rd December 2019b]. Available at: https://www.telegraphindia.com/states/north-east/ meghalaya-government-favours-coal-mining-regulations/ cid/1689830
Ministry of Mines (2009). Mining Policy Legislation (Overview). Government of India, New Delhi [Internet]. [Cited 3rd December 2019]. Available at: http://mines.nic. in/UserView?mid=1319.
Mishra, B.P., Tripathi, O.P., Tripathi, R.S. and H.N. Pandey (2004). Effects of anthropogenic disturbance on plant diversity and community structure of a sacred grove in Meghalaya, Northeast India. Biodiversity & Conservation, 13(2): 421-436.
Nomani, M.Z.M. (2004). Right to Health: A Socio-Legal Perspective. Uppal, New Delhi, pp. 56-85.
Nomani, M.Z.M. (2009). Environment Impact Assessment Law. New Delhi: Satyam Law International. See also: Islam, K.M.B. and Nomani, M.Z.M. (2019). Environment Impact Assessment: Precept & Practice, New Delhi: Mankin Press.
Nomani, M.Z.M. (2000). Laws and flaws relating to biological diversity in India: A kaleidoscopic view. Company Law Journal, 2: 17-22.
Nomani, M.Z.M. (2000b). The human right to environment in India: Legal precepts and judicial doctrines in critical perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, 5: 113.
Nomani, M.Z.M. (2010). Biological diversity, IPR and sustainable development: A critical appraisal of access and benefit sharing models of U.S., Australia and India. International Journal of Environmental Consumerism, 11&12: 40-55.
Nomani, M.Z.M. (2011). Legal framework for environment impact assessment in India: A contemporary appraisal in corporate perspective. Chartered Accountant Journal, 59(12): 1872-1879.
Nomani, M.Z.M. (2019a). The access and benefitsharing regime: An environmental justice perspective. Environmental Policy and Law, 49(4-5): 259-263; DOI 10.3233/EPL-190172.
Nomani, M.Z.M. and M. Rauf (2019b). Legal policies for bioprospecting of natural resources in India. Indian Journal of Environmental Protection, 39(11): 1009-1015.
Nomani, M.Z.M., Wani M.R. and M. Tahreem (2019c). Impact of judicial doctrine and geo spatial technologies in refinement of environmental impact assessment laws and policies in India. International Journal of Recent Technology & Engineering, 8(4): 8013-8016; DOI:10.35940/ijrte.D4399.118419
Otto, J.M. (2009). Global Trends in Mine Reclamation and Closure. In: Mining, Society and a Sustainable World. Richards, J. (Ed.). Springer Science & Business Media. 2009.
Sasson, M. (2000). Enviromental Aspects of Mine Closure. In: Mine Closure and Sustainable Development. Khanna T. (Ed.). United Kingdom, London: Mining Journal Book Ltd, pp. 11-16.
Shimray, U.A. and M.V. Ramana (2007). Uranium mining in Meghalaya: Simmering problem. Economic and Political Weekly, 29: 13-17.
Singh, O.P. (2012). Impact of Coal Mining on Water Resources and Environment in Meghalaya [Internet]. [cited 3rd December 2019]. Available at: https://www. researchgate.net/publication/303487611_Impact_of_Coal_ Mining_on_Water_Resources_and_Environment_in_ Meghalaya [accessed Dec 25 2018].
Swer, S. and O.P. Singh (2003). Coal mining impacting water quality and aquatic biodiversity in Jaintia Hills District of Meghalaya. Himalayan Ecology, 11(2): 29.
The Meghalaya Mines and Mineral Policy (2012). The Gazette of Meghalaya. Mining and Geology Department, Govt. of Meghalaya. No.MG.40/2010/200. November 5th 2012. Shillong [Internet]. [cited 21st December 2019]. Available at: http://megdmg.gov.in/pdf/Extra%20 Ordinary%20Gazette%20Mines%20and%20Menirals%20 Policy%202012.pdf.(MMMP, 2012, 15).
Tiwari, B.K., Barik, S.K., Tripathi. B. and R.S. Tripathi (1998). Biodiversity value, status, and strategies for conservation of sacred groves of Meghalaya, India. Ecosystem Health, 4(1): 20-32.
Warhurst, A. and L. Noronha (1999). Integrated environmental management and planning for closure: The challenges. Minerals and Energy, 14(3): 6-11.