AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Volume 15 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.3233/AJW-180058
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Identification of Effective Components for Increasing the  Sustainable Efficiency of Thermal Power Plants (with  emphasis on Air Pollution) Using the SBSC Technique

Noushin Sanjaranipour1 Farideh Atabi2* Mansour Momeni3 Jamal Ghodousi1 Akram al-Muluk Lahijanian1
Show Less
1 Department of Environmental Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Environmental Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Management Department, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
AJWEP 2018, 15(4), 57–68; https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-180058
Submitted: 12 March 2018 | Revised: 9 August 2018 | Accepted: 9 August 2018 | Published: 24 October 2018
© 2018 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Increasing the efficiency of the electric power industry is extremely important, leading to lower costs, higher profitability, possibility of proper output, efficient use of resources, reduction of pollutants and, ultimately, environmental protection. In this regard, identification of effective indicators for the sustainable operation of thermal power plants is essential, which has the largest share in the country’s electricity production and one of the most important air pollutant industries. Using the Sustainable Balanced Score Card (SBSC) technique is a powerful way to design indicators for assessing the organization’s sustainability performance (efficiency). The purpose of this research is to identify the effective components on performance evaluation in thermal power plants (with emphasis on air pollution) with respect to the Sustainable Balanced Score Card approach. In this research, the statistical population consisted of experts and managers of Tavanir Company and senior managers of power plants. A questionnaire was used to collect data. The reliability of the results of the questionnaires evaluation was estimated 0.84 using Cronbach’s alpha. The results of this research showed that thermal power plants can be evaluated based on Sustainable Balanced Score Card model with five economic indicators (3 criteria), environmental (4 criteria), internal processes (4 criteria), growth and learning (5 criteria), sustainability (2 criteria), and while monitoring of their main processes; it can be identified as efficient units with maximum efficiency and the least pollutants.

Keywords
Thermal power plants
efficiency
air pollution
sustainable balanced score card (SBSC)
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References

Arash Atoor, M., Karbasi, A., Amiri, M.J. and N. Mehrdadi (2014). Evaluation and compilation of performance indicators of the HSE management system, Second National and Specialized Conference on Environmental Researches in Iran, Hamedan, Shahid Mofatteh University.

Athanasios, Chatzimouratidis, I. and A.P. Pilavachi (2012). Decision Support System for Power Plant Impact on the Living Standard. Energy Conversion and Managment.

Atmaca, E. and H. Burak Basar (2012). Evaluation of power plants in Turkey using Analytic Network Process (ANP), Energy, 44: 555-563.

Babaee, B. (2007). Measurement and Efficiency Evaluation in Commercial Banks Using Data Envelopment Analysis in Iran, Master’s thesis, Tarbiat Modarres University.

Chai, N. (2009). Sustainability Performance evaluation System in Government: A Balanced Scorecard Approach.

Elahi, Sh. (1999). Organizational Performance Triangle. Proceedings of the Second Martyr Raja’i Festival, Performance Evaluation of the Executive Offices of the Country, Tehran, Administrative and Recruitment Organization, Iran.

Energy Balance Sheet (2015). Company of Management of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power in Iran (Tavanir), Department of Human Resources and Research.

Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S. and M. Wagner (2001a). Sustainability Balanced Scorecard. Center for Sustainability Management: Luneburg.

Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S. and M. Wagner (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11: 269-284.

Hahn, T. and M. Wagner (2001). Sustainability Balanced Scorecard – Von der Theoriezur Umsetzung. Lüneburg: Center for Sustainability Management.

Hanak, D.P., Kolios, A.J., Biliyok, C. and V. Manovic (2015). Probabilistic performance assessment of a coal-fired power plant. Applied Energy, 139: 350-364.

Hsu, C.W., Hu, A.H., Chiou, C.Y. and T.C. Chen (2011). Using the FDM and ANP to construct a sustainability balanced scorecard for the semiconductor industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 38: 12891-12899.

Ing-Long, W. and CH. Jian-Liang (2014). A Stage-based diffusion of IT Innovation and the BSC Performance Impact: A Moderator of Technology–Organization– Environment. Technological Forecasting & Social Change,
8: 76-90.

Kadarova Jaroslava, Durkacova Michaela and Kalafusova Lenka (2014). Balanced Scorecard as an issue taught in the field of Industrial Engineering. Procedia-Social Behavioral Sciences,174-179.

Medel-Gonzáleza, F., García-Ávilaa, L.F., Pamplona Salomonb,V.A., Marx-Gómezc, J. and C.T. Cecilia Toledo Hernándezd (2012). Sustainability performance Measurement with Analytic Network Process and balanced scorecard: Cuban practical case. Production. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/0103-6513.189315

Nikkhah, M. and A. Nikkhah (2013). Evaluation of Strategies Implementation at Power Plants Using a Balanced Scorecard (Neka Power Generation Management Company). International Management, Challenges and Solutions Conference, Shiraz.

Olve, N.G. and A. Sjöstrand (2006). Balanced Scorecard. (A. Soleimani, Trans.). Capstone.

Rabbani, A., Zammani, M., Yazdani-Ghamzini, A. and E. Kazimieras Zavadskas (2014). Proposing a New Integrated Model based on Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC) and MCDM approaches by Using linguistic variables for the Performance Evaluation of Oil Producing Companies. Expert Systems with Applications, 41: 7316-7327.

Rahimi, Gh. (2006). Performance Evaluation and Continuous Improvement of Organization. Tadbir Journal, 173.

Sadeghi, H., Naseri, A.R. and L. Shahriari (2013). Examination of the Factors Affecting the Efficiency of Gas Power Plants. Journal of Iranian Energy Economics, 93-107.

Samadi, R. and S. Tika (2007). Preparation of Environmental Model for Establishment of Thermal Power Plants in the Country. Journal of Environmental Studies, 33(44).

Schauß, J., Hirsch, B. and M. Sohn (2014). Functional fixation and the balanced scorecard: Adaption of BSC users judgment processes. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 4: 540-566.

Stern, N. (2006). Stern review: The Economics of Climate Change. Final report published 30/10/06 by HM Treasury Department. Available from http://www.hmtreasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/stern_review_economics_ climate_change/stern review_index.cfmS

Sueyoshia, T., Goto, B.M. and C.M. Sugiyama (2013). DEA window analysis for environmental assessment in a dynamic time shift: Performance assessment of U.S. coal-fired power plants. Energy Economics, 40: 845-857.

Sueyoshi, T. and M. Goto (2015). Environmental Assessment on Coal-Fired Power Plants in U.S. North-East Region by DEA Non-Radial Measurement. Energy Economics, doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.04.016.

Tavalayi, R. (2007). Bimonthly of Police Human Development Bulletin, 4(12): 9-30. Towards Sustainable Development. Springer, New York.

UN (2001). Guidance in preparing national sustainable development strategies. Revised Draft, New York, Oct,
2001.

Yadav, V.K., Kumar, N., Ghosh, S. and K. Singh (2014). Indian thermal power plant challenges and remedies via application of modified data envelopment analysis. International Transactions in Operational Research, 21: 955-977.

Zhao, H. and N. Li (2015). Evaluating the Performance of Thermal Power Enterprises Using Sustainability Balanced Scorecard, Fuzzy Delphic and Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approaches for Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.141.

 

Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing