AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Volume 15 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.3233/AJW-180061
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Uncertainty Modelling of Waste Disposal Site Selection  (Case Study: Marivan City)

Kayvan Bagheri Sayed Shekari1 Najmeh Neysani Samany1* Morteza Omidipoor2 Sirous Hashemi Darehbadami1
Show Less
1 Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Iran
AJWEP 2018, 15(4), 89–98; https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-180061
Submitted: 14 March 2018 | Revised: 10 August 2018 | Accepted: 10 August 2018 | Published: 24 October 2018
© 2018 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Waste disposal site selection is complex and multifaceted decision making process. In this regard to find appropriate sites, there are different local, national and international standards. These standards emphasize on certain criteria and related on different environmental, economic, social and political considerations. Lack of a comprehensive, integrated and efficient waste disposal site selection approach for determination of the proper sites stems from different experts comments. Since every expert in such problems doesn’t have adequate knowledge of all aspects about the subject; their opinions are facing with uncertainty. This study aims to modeling uncertainty of waste disposal site selection based on Dempster-Shafer Theory (DST). The main contribution of this study is the reduction of uncertainty in the standard combination according to experts using DST. In this research three main standards including ‘Environment Protection Agency of Iran (EPAI)’, ‘Management and Planning Organization of Iran (MPOI)’ and ‘Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)’ standards are considered and then site selection performed for each standard independently. In order to combining these standards, opinions of 40 experts are attained through DST as an integration approach that is able to manage the uncertainty. These comments are examined by DST and gained results are depicted as waste disposal location. Finally, the achieved results are compared with the results of simple weighting method (average of the opinion experts). Results showed that standard weight in questioning, that does not follow the normal, gives a lot of uncertainty in analysis that DST significantly reduces its impact.

Keywords
Waste disposal
uncertainty
MPCA
EPAI
MPOI
DST
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References

Ahamed, S., Sengupta, M.K., Mukherjee, A., Hossain,M.A., Das, B., Nayak, B. and G. Chatterjee, G. (2006). Arsenic groundwater contamination and its health effects in the state of Uttar Pradesh (UP) in upper and middle Ganga plain, India: A severe danger. Science of the Total Environment, 370(2): 310-322.

Alhumoud, J.M. and A.A. (2006). A comprehensive evaluation of solid waste management in Kuwait. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 3(2): 176-192.

Amiri, A. (2007). In Tehran seismic risk assessment by applying the theories of uncertainty intuition jeans. A master’s thesis, Technical Faculty of Tehran University.

Ashqan, M. (2007). Risk assessment using fuzzy logic and Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. A master’s thesis, Tehran University.

Boone, B., Shami, M. and H. Weinick (2008). Solid waste management strategies and global sustainability of deconstruction. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 8(2-3): 229-260.

Dempster, A.P. (1967). Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. The annals of mathematical statistics, 325-339.

Fabbricino, M. (2011). Modelling industrial waste management at regional scale. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, 7(3-4): 279-293.

Fehr, M. (2007). Confirming decentralised composting as a definite option in urban waste management. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 7(3-4): 274-285.

Han, Z., Ma, H., Shi, G., He, L., Wei, L. and Q. Shi (2016). A review of groundwater contamination near municipal solid waste landfill sites in China. Science of the Total Environment, 569: 1255-1264.

Jahankhah, M., Moshiri, B., Delavar, M.R., and M. Zare (2009). The evidential reasoning approach for a multi attribute decision making method in geospatial information.

Jhamnani, B. and S.K. Singh (2009). Groundwater contamination due to Bhalaswa landfill site in New
Delhi. Int J Environ Sci Eng, 1.3: 121-125.

Kontos, T.D., Komilis, D.P. and C.P. Halvadakis (2003). Siting MSW landfills on Lesvos island with a GIS-based methodology. Waste Management & Research, 21(3): 262-277.

Ltfy, M. (2011). Study of belief and some of its applications. A master’s thesis. University of Isfahan, Iran.

Mohebbi, P. (2015). Urban Flood Risk Assessment and Zoning using Geographic Information System (GIS) in some parts of Tehran. A master’s thesis. Geographic Faculty of Tehran University.

Mrady. H., Mhmdy. M. and H. Qasmy (2010). Analysis of landslide in Golestan province using Dempster-Shafer theory. Earth Science Research, 3: 1-14

Pasha, Mstfyay, H., Khalaj, M. and F. Khalaj (2013). Calculated based on the uncertainty Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and Shannon entropy. No. 3, pp. 216-
223.

Pongrácz, E. (2006). Industrial ecology and waste management: From theories to applications. Progress in Industrial Ecology, an International Journal, 3(1-2): 59-74.

Shafer, G. (1976). A mathematical theory of evidence (Vol.1). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Shmelev, S.E. and J.R. Powell (2006). Ecological–economic modelling for strategic regional waste management systems. Ecological Economics, 59(1): 115-130.

Sidifar, Lida and Munira Majlesi (2013). Evaluation of environmental waste disposal site metropolitan city of Marand by the Agency’s pollution control Minnesota (MPCA) and compared with the location criteria Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA), the second International Conference on Waste Management Waste and Biomass, Tehran. Tehran University Management School.

Suomi, R., Serkkola, A. and P. Korhonen (2017). Monitoring indicators for source segregation in municipal solid waste management. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, 19(2): 164-180.

Tayyebi, A.H., Delavar, M.R., Tayyebi, A. and M. Golobi (2010). Combining multi criteria decision making and Dempster Shafer theory for landfill site selection. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science, 38(Part 8), 6.

Udeorji, C.I. and S.A. Oke (2007). Sensitivity Analysis of the Framework for Measuring the Physiological Effects of Inappropriate Waste Disposal. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 4(1): 125-131.

Udeorji, C.I., Oke, S.A. and W.O. Adedeji (2005). An Approach in Modelling the Physiological Effects of Waste Disposal on Human Health. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 2(1): 9-18.

Waste Management Agency and the University of Science and Technology Iran (2011). Study, analyze and locating in Tehran Final Waste. Waste Management Organization.

Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing