AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Volume 15 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.3233/AJW-180023
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Assessment and Estimation of Environmental Costs of Kasilian Dam

Mahsa Khodarahmi1 Mohammad Javad Amiri2* Abdolreza Karbassi3 Sanaz Tajziehchi3 Hassan Darabi4
Show Less
1 Department of Assessment and Land Use Planning, Faculty of Environment and Energy, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Environmental Planning, Management and Education, Graduate Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 mental Engineering, Graduate Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Environmental Design, Graduate Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
AJWEP 2018, 15(2), 107–114; https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-180023
Submitted: 1 August 2017 | Revised: 15 February 2018 | Accepted: 15 February 2018 | Published: 11 May 2018
© 2018 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Despite the benefits of large dams, there are still concerns about their real benefits and environmental  costs. Effects on social and natural ecosystems could be one of the most important external costs of dams’  construction. The aim of this study is to identify the environmental and social costs of Kasilian hydropower Dam  in Mazandaran Province, Iran, to reduce the negative consequences and move towards sustainable environmental  development. In order to estimate the environmental costs, it is necessary to calculate the damaging and negative  effects as well as the benefits of dam construction such that to calculate the net profit. Thus, this paper is one of  the first efforts focusing on identifying the most important social and environmental impacts of dams’ construction.  Using the HECAM (Hydropower’s Environmental Costs Analysis Model) software and considering the economic,  social and environmental indicators, we estimated the benefit ratio to the cost of Kasilian hydroelectric dam to  be about 3.5. We also found that land loss and electricity generation have the highest cost and the greatest profit  associated with the lack of greenhouse gases, the water and electricity sale.

Keywords
Environmental cost
hydropower
dam
HECAM
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References

Brismar, A. (2004). Attention to impact pathways in EISs of large dam projects. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(1): 59-87.

Dendena,  B.  and  S.  Corsi  (2015) .  The  Environmental and  Social  Impact Assessment: A further  step toward an  integrated  assessment process. Journal of  Cleaner Production, 108: 965-977.

De Sousa Júnior, W.C. and J. Reid (2010). Uncertainties in Amazon hydropower development: Risk scenarios and environmental issues around the Belo Monte dam. Water Alternatives, 3(2).

Hallaj, Z. (2008). Manage and increase the productivity of water and energy resources in agriculture and natural resources. The 4th Scientific Conference of Student Associations of Engineering and Agriculture, Natural Resources and the Environment. The University of Tehran.

Hamilton, S.H., El Sawah, S., Guillaume, J.H., Jakeman, A.J. and S.A. Pierce (2015) . Integrated assessment and modeling: Overview and synthesis of salient dimensions. Environmental Modelling and Software, 64: 215-229.

Hainoun, A., Almoustafa, A. and M.S. Aldin (2010) . Estimating the health damage costs of Syrian electricity generation system using impact pathway approach. Energy, 35(2): 628-638.

Kentel, E. and E. Alp (2013). Hydropower in Turkey: Economical, social and environmental aspects and legal challenges. Environmental Science and Policy, 31, 34-43.

Lechner, A.M., McIntyre, N., Witt, K., Raymond, C.M., Arnold, S., Scott, M. and W. Rifkin (2017). Challenges of integrated modeling in mining regions to address social, environmental and economic impacts. Environmental Modelling and Software, 93: 268-281.

Ministry of Power (2015). Flood and River Floods Working Group. Flood Management Master Plan. Tehran, Iran.

Saeedi, M., Karbassi, A. and R. Samadi (2006) . The Environmental Management of Power Plants. Ministry of Power’s Publication—Organization of Energy Efficiency of Iran (S.A.B.A).

Tajziehchi, S., Monavari, S.M., Karbassi,A.R., Shariat, S.M., Khorasani, N. and P. Narimisa (2014). A critical look at social impact evaluation of dam construction by revised SIMPACTS software—A case study of Alborz Dam in Northern Iran. International Journal of Environmental Research, 8(2): 329-334.

Tajziehchi, S., Monavari, S.M., Karbassi,A.R., Shariat, S.M. and N. Khorasani (2013). Quantification of Social Impacts of Large Hydropower Dams—A case study of Alborz Dam in Mazandaran Province, Northern Iran. International Journal of Environmental Research, 7(2): 377-382.

Tilt, B., Braun, Y. and D. He (2009). Social impacts of large dam projects: A comparison of international case studies and implications for best practice. Journal of Environmental Management, 90: S249-S257.

Vanclay, F., Esteves, A.M., Aucamp, I. and D.M. Franks (2015). Social Impact Assessment: Guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects.

Vanclay, F. (2003). International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(1): 5-12.

Wallmo, K. and D.K. Lew (2011). Valuing improvements to threatened and endangered marine species: An application of stated preference choice experiments. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(7): 1793-1801.

Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing