Modelling Ecotourism Zoning Using FAHP— Case Study: Masal Area
This study aimed to identify and select areas suitable for ecotourism. In this research, to assess the potential of ecotourism of Masal district, Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and GIS were used. For this purpose, appropriate evaluation criteria and sub-criteria were identified for determining recreational potential. Then, using AHP fuzzy, criteria and sub-criteria to determine the importance of assessing the potential recreational area prepared questionnaires and, were distributed among clinicians. Weighted criteria and sub-criteria in each questionnaire were calculated and by averaging the weights, final weight was calculated using the model. The required maps for evaluating of the recreational potential were generated by using GIS software and then these data layers were standardized using pertained function in IDRISI. Finally, the final map of recreational potential was prepared. The results of the final map of ecotourism potential showed that 89.97, 8.61 and 1.42 percent of the total area have very high, low and no potential for ecotourism activities, respectively. Areas with a high density of vegetation and water resources with suitable climatic conditions have the greatest potential for ecotourism activities in the study area. Area with low and poor ecotourism potential are central and eastern parts of the region, and there are low density of ecotourism activities and facilities in this area.
Arenberger, A. (2006). Recreation use of urban forests: An inter-area comparison. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 4(3-4): 135-144.
Bunruamkaew, K. and Y. Murayama (2012). Land Use and Natural Resources Planning for Sustainable Ecotourism Using GIS in Surat Thani, Thailand. Sustainability, 4(3): 412-429.
Bukenya, J.O. (2000). Application of GIS in ecotourism development decisions. Evidence from the Pearl of Africa, 30(1): 30-55.
Babaie-Kafaky, S., Mataji, A. and N. Ahmadi Sani (2009). Ecological capability assessment for multiple-use in forest areas using GIS-based multiple criteria decision making approach. American Environmental Sciences, 5(6): 714- 721.
Chang, N.B. (2008). Combing GIS with Fuzzy multicriteria decision making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. Environmental Management, 87(1): 139-153.
Cheng, R.W., Chin, T.L. and C.C. Huang (2007). Optimal selection of location for Taiwanese hospitals to ensure a competitive. Building and Environment, 4(2): 1431–1444.
Davenport, J. and D. Julia (2006). The impact of tourism and personal leisure transporting coastal environments: A review. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 67(3): 280-292.
Farajzadeh, M. and T. Karami (2004). Land use planning by using of RS and GIS (Case Study: Khoram Abad). Geography Researches, 37(47): 81-94 (In Persian).
Gorener, A., Toker, K. and K. Ulucay (2012). Application of combined SWOT and AHP: A case study for a manufacturing firm. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5(8): 1525-1534.
Gulinck, H., Vyverman, N. and A. Gobin (2000). Landscape as framework for integrating local subsistence and ecotourism: A case study in Zimbabwe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 5(3): 173-182.
Gul, A.M., Orucu, K. and K. Oznur (2006). An approach for recreation suitability analysis to recreation planning in Golchuk Nature Park. Environmental Management, 1(3): 606-625.
Hajehforooshnia, Sh., Soffianian, A., Mahiny, A.S. and S. Fakheran (2011). Multi objective land allocation (MOLA) for zoning Ghamishloo Wildlife Sanctuary in Iran. Nature Conservation, 19(1): 254-262.
Jozi, S.A., Zaredar, N. and S. Rezaeian (2010). Evaluation of ecological capability using spatial multi criteria evaluation method (SMCE) (Case study: Implementation of indoor recreation in Varjin protected area, Iran). International Environmental Science and Development, 3(1): 273-277.
Jiang, H. and R.R. Eastman (2000). Application of Fuzzy Measures in Multi-criteria Evaluation in GIS. International Geographic Information Systems, 14(2): 173-184.
Kumari, S., Behera, M.D. and H.R. Tewari (2010). Identification of potential ecotourism sites in West District, Sikkim using geospatial tools. Tropical Ecology, 51(1): 75-85.
Kurttila, M. and M. Pesonen (2000). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process AHP in SWOT analysis: A hybrid method and its application to aforest certification case. Forest Policy and Economics, 1(5): 82-95.
Li, Z., Zeng, G., Zhang, H., Yang, B. and J. Sheng (2007). The integrated eco environment assessment of the red soil hilly region based on GIS – A case study in Changsha City, China. Ecological Modelling, 3(4): 540-546.
Loperz, R. (2002). Evaluating ecotourism in natural protected areas of La Paz Bay, Baja California Sur, Mexico: Ecotourism or nature based tourism? Biodiversity and Conservation, Monteros, 11(5): 1539-1550.
Laurance, W., Alonso, M. and P. Campbell (2005). Challenge for forest conservation in Gabon. Centeral Africa, 3(8): 454-474.
Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multi criteria Decision Analysis. Academic, scientific, and professional books. Washington, DC.
Makhdom, M. (2010). Principles of land use. University of Tehran. (In Persian.)
Rajesh, R.S. and P.S. Slobodan (2010). Fuzzy set theory based methodology for the analysis of measurement uncertainties in river discharge and stage. Civil Engineering, 37(2): 442-440.
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process, planning priority. Resource Allocation. RWS Publication, USA.
Saaty, T.L. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—What it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 3(5): 161-176.
Saaty, T.L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Operational Research, 4(8): 9-26.
Saaty, T.L. (1994). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces, 24(6): 19-43.
Shirvani, Z. (2009). Comparing of three evaluation method (AHP, Makhdom, Gulz-Dimiril) for recreation capability of Neka-Zalemrood forests. M.Sc. of forestry, University of Mazandaran. (In Persian.)
Van Laarhoven, P.J.M. and W. Pedrycz (1983). Fuzzy Extension for Saaty’s Priority Theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(3): 229-241.