AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Volume 14 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.3233/AJW-170023
RESEARCH ARTICLE

An Optimization Model Using the Standard Deviation  Method and Multiple Decision Making Statistics in Water Treatment Plants in Northeastern India

Sudipa Choudhury1* Mrinmoy Majumder2 Apu Kumar Saha2
Show Less
1 Department of Mathematics, National Institute of Technology, Agartala, Tripura, India
2 School of Hydro-Informatics Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Agartala, Tripura, India
AJWEP 2017, 14(3), 27–37; https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-170023
Submitted: 27 September 2016 | Revised: 19 April 2017 | Accepted: 19 April 2017 | Published: 5 July 2017
© 2017 by the 2017-07-05. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Water treatment plants provide an integral service to both households and industries by supplying an  essential component for day to day living as well as for commercial processes. In order to maintain an efficient  and sustainable water supply, the various components implicit in the processes in WTPs need to be aligned in  an optimal configuration of settings that balances various input parameters. In order to identify these optimal  allocations, this study aims to propose an indicator that represents the suitability of the instruments in surface  water treatment plants. It utilizes a new adaptation of multi-criteria decision making techniques, the Standard  Deviation Method alongside the well adapted Analytical Hierarchy Process for this purpose. In total six criteria,  four sub-criteria and twelve alternatives were considered for the study with the global priorities being computed  with the help of the AHP and STD methods.

The GMDH modelling framework was also used to evaluate the relation between various input parameters and  the indicator. These methods in effect work to identify priority quality parameters of inputs with respect to the  overall performance of the instruments. To refine and improve the MCDM methods used, this study developed  twelve different models by adapting the number of inputs as well as the types of training algorithms to increase  representative accuracy. Results suggest that daily changes in turbidity were the most significant parameter followed  by pH affecting the efficiency of the WTP’s key processes

Keywords
MCDM
AHP
standard deviation method.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests
References
Anastasakis, L. and N. Mort (2001). The development of Self-organization techniques in modelling: A review of the Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH). https://www.gmdhshell.com/old/sites/default/files/Research%20Report%20about%20GMDH%20-%20Anastasakis&Mort.pdf.

Kumar, K. Sundara et al. (2010). Performance evaluation of waste water treatment plant. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2(12), 7785-7796.

Marko, K. (2006). A landslide susceptibility model using the Analytical Hierarchy Process method and multivariate statistics in Slovenia. Geomorphology, 74(1-4), 17-28.

Robert, H. et al. (2002). Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 141(1), 70-87.

Saaty, T. (1980). The Analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Saaty, T. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.

Saaty, T. (2005). Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA.

Tahriri, F. et al. (2008). AHP approach for supplier evaluation and selection in a steel manufacturing company. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 1(02), 54-76.

Velasquez, M. and P.T. Hester (2013). An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56-66.
Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing