Effect of Rice Mill Wastewater on Soil Respiration and Enzyme Activities under Field and Pot Conditions
The physico-chemical characteristics of rice mill wastewater was measured and the effect of rice mill wastewater on respiration and enzyme activities (amylase, invertase, protease and dehydrogenase) of rice cropped soil was investigated under field and pot conditions at 15 days interval for 90 days. For the pot experiment five different concentrations (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100%) of rice mill wastewater was used. The results of the field experiment revealed significant difference in the soil respiration and enzyme activities rates of control and experimental plots from 30 days onwards. After 90 days the soil respiration and enzyme activities were inhibited by about 25-34% in experimental plots, whereas the results of the pot experiment revealed a maximum increase of about 36% in soil respiration and 24-45% in enzyme activities (amylase, invertase, protease and dehydrogenase) in 50% wastewater irrigated soil and a maximum decrease of about 40% in soil respiration and 24-40% in enzyme activities in 100% wastewater irrigated soil. The adverse effects of rice mill wastewater (100%) on soil respiration and enzyme activities were attributed to alkaline pH (8.0) of wastewater with higher contents of phenols (35 mg-1l), silica (58 mg-1 l) and sodium (235 mg-1l). Significant increase in soil respiration and enzyme activities at lower concentrations (i.e. 50%) may be due to the fact that, the above parameters being in the diluted form could favour the microflora to boost their activities. On the basis of above findings, we suggest that the rice mill wastewater should be diluted up to 50% before use for agricultural purpose. However, further works on the effect of rice mill wastewater on different crops and soil animals are needed to corroborate the present findings.
APHA (1989). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 18th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
Bernhart, C.L.H. and R. Vestal (1983). Effects of environ- mental toxicants on metabolic activity of natural microbial communities. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 46: 970-977.
Burns, R.G. (1982). Enzyme activity in soil: Location and possible role in microbial ecology. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 14: 423-427.
Calabrese, E. and R. Blain (2005). The occurrence of hormetic dose responses in the toxicological literature, the hormesis database: An overview. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 202: 289-301.
Casida, L.E. Jr., Klein, D.A. and T. Santoro (1964). Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Science, 98: 371-376.
Cox, L., Celis, R., Hermosin, M.C., Becker, A. and J. Cornejo (1997). Porosity and herbicide leaching in soils amended with olive mill wastewater. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment, 65: 151-161.
Danana, G.H., Parekh, L.J. and C.V. Ramakrishnan (1985). Bacterial profile of petrochemical industry effluents. Environmental Pollution (A), 39: 27-37.
Dee, B.M., Haynes, R.J. and M.H. Graham (2003). Changes in soil acidity and the size and activity of the microbial biomass in response to the addition of sugar mill wastes. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 37: 47-54.
Gong, P., Heng Sun, T., Beudert, G. and H. Hahn (1997). Ecological effects of combined organic or inorganic pollution on soil microbial activities. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 96: 133-143.
Grist, D.H. (1953). Rice. Longmans Green and Co., London.
Hamida, S.K. (2005). Fungal and Bacterial Populations in Cement-Incorporated Soil. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 7(2): 158-161.
Hodges, L. (1973). Environmental Pollution. Holt, Rinehort and Winson Inc., New York.
ISI (Indian Standards Institution) (1974). Tolerance limit for industrial effluents discharged into inland surface waters. No. 2490, New Delhi.
ISI (Indian Standards Institution) (1977). Tolerance limit for discharge of industrial effluents on land for irrigation. No. 3307, New Delhi.
Kiss, S., Dragan-Bularda, M. and D. Radulescu (1975). Biological significance of enzymes in soil. Advances in Agronomy, 27: 25-87.
Lundegardh, H. (1927). Carbon dioxide evolution of soil and crop growth. Soil Science, 23: 417-453.
Macfadyen, A. (1970). Soil metabolism in relation to ecosystem, energy flow and to primary and secondary production. In: Method of study in soil ecology. J. Phillipson (ed.). IBP/UNESCO, Paris.
Makoi, J.H.J.R. and A. Ndakidemi (2008). Selected soil enzymes: Examples of their potential roles in the ecosystem. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7(3): 181-191.
Mishra, P.C. and S.C. Pradhan (1987). Seasonal variation in amylase, invertase, Cellulose activity and carbon dioxide evolution in tropical grassland of Orissa, India, sprayed with carbaryl insecticide. Environmental Pollution, 43: 291- 300.
Mishra, P.C. and S. Sahoo (1989). Agropotentiality of paper mill wastewater. In: Soil Pollution and Soil Organisms. P.C. Mishra (ed.). Ashis Publ. House, New Delhi.
Mishra, P.C., Mohanty, R.K. and M.C. Dash (1979). Enzyme activity in subtropical surface soils under pasture. Indian Journal of Agricultural Chemistry, 12: 19-24.
Padhan, A. and S.K. Sahu (2004). Process details and effluent characteristics of a rice mill in the Sambalpur district of Orissa. Jr. of Industrial Pollution and Control, 20(1): 111-124.
Pancholy, S.K. and E.L. Rice (1973). Soil enzymes in relation to old-field succession: amylase, cellulase, invertase, dehydrogenase and urease. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 37: 47-50.
Panda, R. (2001). Ecotoxicology of the effluent of a galvanizing factory on soil, Oriya sativa. L. (Rice plant) and Drawida willsi Michaelsen (Oligochaeta). Ph.D thesis, Sambalpur University, Orissa, India.
Panda, S. and S.K. Sahu (2000). Respiration and enzyme activities of soil following application of an organo- phosphorous insecticide. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 26: 75-82.
Pati, S.S. and S.K. Sahu (2004). CO2 evolution and enzyme activities (dehydrogenase, protease and amylase) of fly ash amended soil in the presence and absence of earthworms (Drawida willsi Michaelsen) under laboratory conditions. Geoderma, 118: 289-301.
Perez, J., De la Rubia, T., Moreno, J. and J. Martizez (1992). Phenolic content and antibacterial activity of olive mill waste waters. Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, 11: 489-495.
Robert, M. and C. Chenu (1992). Interactions between soil minerals and microorganisms. Soil Biochemestry, 7: 370-379.
Ross, D.J. (1970). Effect of storage on dehydrogenase activities in soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2: 55-61.
Ross, D.J. (1971). Some factors influencing the estimation of dehydrogenease activities of some soil under pasture. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 3: 97-110.
Ross, D.J. (1976). Invertase and Amylase activities in rye grass and white clover plants and their relationship, with activities in soil under pasture. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 8: 351-356.
Skujins, J. (1978). History of abiotic soil enzymes. In: Soil Enzyme. R.G. Burns (ed.). Academic Press, London.
Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochran (1967). Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press, USA.
Speir, T.W. and D.J. Ross (1975). Effect of storage on the activities of protease, urease, phosphatase and sulphatase in three soils under pasture. New Zealand Journal of Science, 18: 231-237.
Tam, N.F.Y. (1998). Effects of waste water discharge on microbial population and enzyme activities in mangrove soils. Environmental Pollution, 102: 233-242.
Tiwari, S.C., Tiwari, B.K. and R.R. Mishra (1989). Microbial community enzyme activity and carbon dioxide evolution in pineapple orchard soil. Tropical Ecology, 30(2): 265-273.
Witkamp, M. (1966). Rate of carbon dioxide evolution from the forest floor. Ecology, 47: 492-494.