AccScience Publishing / JCTR / Volume 5 / Issue 5 / DOI: 10.18053/jctres.05.202005.002
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Influence of instrument design on post-operative pain in single-visit root canal treatment with Protaper Next and V taper 2H rotary systems in symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of multirooted teeth – A randomized clinical trial

Koppala Sudhakar1 Chinni Suneel Kumar1* Anumula Lavanya1 Sannapureddy Swapna1
Show Less
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Chintareddypalem, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
Received: 12 November 2019 | Revised: 14 March 2020 | Accepted: 14 March 2020 | Published online: 12 May 2020
© 2020 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Aim: The objective of this randomized clinical trial was to clinically evaluate the incidence of postoperative pain after root canal treatment in symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of multi-rooted teeth using two different instrument design rotary file systems, namely Protaper Next (PTN) and V taper 2H (VT2H).

Methods: In this prospective randomized clinical trial 60 patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of multirooted teeth, indicated for root canal therapy, were randomly assigned to two groups according to instrument system used viz. PTN, VT2H. Root canal treatments were performed in single visit. After treatment, the participants were asked to rate the intensity of postoperative pain on modified verbal descriptor scale after 8hrs, 24hrs, 48hrs, and 72hrs over the telephone by a second investigator. Patients were advised to call the second investigator by telephone if they felt very uncomfortable at any point of the follow-up time. At that time, they were asked to take Ibuprofen 200mg as the rescue drug.

Results: No statistically significant difference was found among the two groups in relation to postoperative pain and intake of analgesic medication at four time points assessed (p> 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test).

Conclusion: The Protaper Next system and V taper 2H rotary system were found to be equal in the incidence of postoperative pain and pain intensity was found to decrease with time, post operatively, in both the rotary systems.

Relevance for patients: The instrument design has little effect on postoperative pain in symptomatic irreversible pulpitis patients after single visit root canal therapy.

Keywords
post-operative pain
Protaper Next
single-visit root canal treatment
symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
V taper 2H
Conflict of interest
The authors deny any conflicts of interest related to this study.
References

[1] Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H. The Prevalence of Postoperative Pain and Flare up in Single and Multiple Visit Endodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review. Int Endod J 2008;41:91-9.

[2] Torabinejad M, Cymerman JJ, Frankson M, Lemon RR, Maggio JD, Schilder H. Effectiveness of various medications on postoperative pain following complete instrumentation. J Endod 1994;20:345-54.

[3] DiRenzo A, Gresla T, Johnson BR, Rogers M, Tucker D, BeGole EA. Postoperative pain after 1 and 2 Visit Root Canal Therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:605-10.

[4] El Mubarak AH, Abu-Bakr NH, Ibrahim YE. Postoperative Pain in Multiple-visit and Single-visit Root Canal Treatment. J Endod 2010;36:36-9.

[5] Pak JG, White SN. Pain Prevalence and Severity before, during, and after Root Canal Treatment: A Systematic Review. J Endod 2011;37:429-38.

[6] Harrison JW, Baumgartner JC, Svec TA. Incidence of Pain Associated with Clinical Factors during and After Root Canal Therapy. Part 2. Postobturation Pain. J Endod 1983;9:434-8.

[7] Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in Endodontics: I. Etiological Factors. 1985. J Endod 2004;30:476-81.

[8] Harrington GW, Natkin E. Midtreatment Flare-ups. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:409-23.

[9] Tanalp J, Güngör T. Apical Extrusion of Debris: A Literature Review of an Inherent Occurrence during Root Canal Treatment. Int Endod J 2014;47:211-21.

[10] Nekoofar MH, Sheykhrezae MS, Meraji N, Jamee A, Shirvani A, Jamee J, et al. Comparison of the Effect of Root Canal Preparation by Using WaveOne and ProTaper on Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod 2015;41:575-8.

[11] Pasqualini D, Corbella S, Alovisi M, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M, Migliaretti G, et al. Postoperative Quality of Life Following Single-visit Root Canal Treatment Performed by Rotary or Reciprocating Instrumentation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int Endod J 2016;49:1030-9.

[12] Gambarini G, Testarelli L, De Luca M, Milana V, Plotino G, Grande NM, Rubini AG, Al Sudani D, Sannino G. The Influence of Three Different Instrumentation Techniques on the Incidence of Postoperative Pain after Endodontic Treatment. Ann Stomatol 2013;4:152.

[13] Hou XM, Su Z, Hou BX. Post Endodontic Pain Following Single-visit Root Canal Preparation with Rotary vs Reciprocating Instruments: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical trials. BMC Oral Health 2017;17:86.

[14] Wang C, Xu P, Ren L, Dong G, Ye L. Comparison of Post Obturation Pain Experience Following One Visit and Two Visit Root Canal Treatment on Teeth with Vital Pulps: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int Endod J 2010;43:692-7.

[15] Neelakantan P, Sharma S. Pain after Single-visit Root Canal Treatment with Two Single-file Systems Based on Different Kinematics a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Clinical Study. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:2211-7.

[16] Mollashahi NF, Saberi EA, Havaei SR, Sabeti M. Comparison of Postoperative Pain after Root Canal Preparation with Two Reciprocating and Rotary Single-File Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Iran Endod J 2017;12:15.

[17] Su Y, Wang C, Ye L. Healing Rate and Post-obturation Pain of Single-versus Multiple-visit Endodontic Treatment for Infected Root Canals: A Systematic Review. J Endod 2011;37:125-32.

Share
Back to top
Journal of Clinical and Translational Research, Electronic ISSN: 2424-810X Print ISSN: 2382-6533, Published by AccScience Publishing